Dan Bogino on his daily podcast a few days ago explained it as:
1. The Obama regime decided to shut down a Russian establishment on the outskirts of Washington supposedly to punish the Russians.
2. The Russian ambasador calls Mike Flynn to see what the heck.
3. Flynn was vacationing in the Dominican Republic where wiretaps are EASY.
4, The phone call is recorded and leaked to (NY TIMES).
5. Flynn is interviewed and if he differs from anything in the recorded call, they get him for lying.
Bogino has said in other broadcasts that Obama had warned Trump about Flynn, that he could not be trusted. In fact, Bogino said that Flynn was the only one that Obama talked about like that. It turns out that Flynn had the goods on some of Obama's scams and that Obama's group of criminals HAD TO GET FLYNN out of the way. They did!
At about time 11 Bogino talks about the FBI 302 interview form is dated IN AUGUST WHEN THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE IN WHAT, JANUARY? WTF?
Obviously the FBI is up to no good. Most likely they generated a NEW 302 interview form with Flynn. I'm sure the original exists and if it does, Mueller is screwed again.
Thanks for providing some insight into the urgency.
What I would like to see happen is that the perpetrators of this scheme actually be forced to testify under oath about what they knew, and what they did. Now the stakes are higher, and the co-conspirators will be legally at jeopardy.
COmey’s explanation (not under oath) for why he sent the two agents over leads to more questions - was he directed or did he do this on his own. Depending how he answers the question, this will lead to others, and documents, or missing documents, etc. Bogino’s explanation is plausible, but still not air tight. Was it that Obozo was trying to get back at Flynn, or was getting back at Flynn a benefit of going after Trump?