Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/10/2018 6:08:57 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Liz

>>the President is not guilty of sexual harassment

using police force to summon a woman to your hotel room and then dropping trousers and ordering her to “kiss it” isn’t harassment

groping a stewardess’ inner thigh while she moves your hand away isn’t sexual harassment

Stalinists lie. Always


2 posted on 12/10/2018 6:13:41 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committtee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

>>Monica Lewinsky’s case illustrates the rest of the equation: ‘’Yes means yes’’

Steinim is a lying bitch. The Feminist movement protested against bosses hiring sex secretaries who willingly went for overnight out of town trips with the boss or freely consented to office romps.

It was said that it put these women at unfair advantage for promotion and consideration (Louis Jordan got Monica a Revlon gig for lying under oath). Also they said that such workplace sexual affairs created a hostile work environment.


4 posted on 12/10/2018 6:16:30 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committtee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

>>The real violators of Ms. Lewinsky’s will were Linda Tripp, who taped their talks

And Clinton woulda gotten away with it too if it hadn’t been for those meddling kids


5 posted on 12/10/2018 6:17:54 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committtee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

SOURCE https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/09/opinion/sunday/bills-belated-metoo-moment.html

During President Bill Clinton’s cascading scandals with women, some political analysts on the left suggested that Americans should look at a commander in chief in terms of private character and public character, disregarding personal peccadilloes and giving weight only to policy decisions.

But with the Clintons, the public and private were always intertwined in an inextricable and unappetizing way.
The desire among his supporters for a liberal agenda was held hostage to Bill Clinton’s libertine appetites. You want enlightened policies for women and a record number of women in exalted posts? Then you must endure — and cover up for — “Saturday Night Bill,” as the dark side of the president was dubbed.

On his recent book tour when Craig Melvin asked Bill on the “Today” show whether his actions in the ’90s would fly in the 2018 #MeToo era. Bill went to his usual go-to: “his excellent record on appointing women.” But that Faustian deal of doing good for all women while being bad with a few was no longer on the table.“How would you have approached the accusations differently, or would you have?” Melvin asked. “Well,” Bill replied, “I don’t think it would be an issue because people would be using the facts, instead of the imagined facts.”

So then, here are the facts, as clear 20 years ago as they are now. When Monica Lewinsky came into the Oval Office and flashed her thong, Bill Clinton should have said: “Young lady, go back to your office. I am the president of the United States.” Like Humphrey Bogart in “Casablanca,” Bill should have been doing the thinking for both of them.

The power differential between a 22-year-old intern and a 49-year-old boss makes any sexual interaction wrong. And if you throw in the fact that he was president — it’s an inexcusable abuse of power.

Gloria Steinem tried to bolster BJ’ed Clinton in a Times op-ed as the scandal unspooled, writing that “welcome sexual behavior is about as relevant to sexual harassment as borrowing a car is to stealing one.”

And it was his narcissism and selfishness on Bill Clinton’s part to force his appointees-—high-ranking women in his inner circle — Hillary, Madeleine Albright and Donna Shalala — to vouch for him when he knew the truth and could simply have admitted it, rather than lying, parsing and besmirching.

Feminists also lost their way as Bill’s human shields, demonizing the women in Bill’s life, treating them as collateral damage, human sacrifices to the sisterhood’ s dream of a feminist president and first lady.

Hillary and other prominent feminists backed BJ’ed Bill; his and Hillary’s henchmen were willing to smear Bill’s girlfriends and victims, calling the women trailer trash, cash-for-trash, nutty and slutty.
So then, here are the facts, as clear 20 years ago as they are now. When Monica Lewinsky came into the Oval Office and flashed her thong, Bill Clinton should have said: “Young lady, go back to your office. I am the president of the United States.” Like Humphrey Bogart in “Casablanca,” Bill should have been doing the thinking for both of them.

The power differential between a 22-year-old intern and a 49-year-old boss makes any sexual interaction wrong. And if you throw in the fact that he was president — it’s an inexcusable abuse of power. Gloria Steinem tried to bolster BJ’ed Clinton in a Times op-ed as the scandal unspooled, writing that “welcome sexual behavior is about as relevant to sexual harassment as borrowing a car is to stealing one.”
And it was his narcissism and selfishness on Bill Clinton’s part to force his appointees-—high-ranking women in his inner circle — Hillary, Madeleine Albright and Donna Shalala — to vouch for him when he knew the truth and could simply have admitted it, rather than lying, parsing and besmirching.

Feminists also lost their way as Bill’s human shields, demonizing the women in Bill’s life, treating them as collateral damage, human sacrifices to the sisterhood’ s dream of a feminist president and first lady.

Feminists looked the other way when Hillary’s Bimbo Eruption Squad went on the attack-—to paint Lewinsky as a malicious stalker or a friendly fantasist — they looked the other way in 1992 when Betsey Wright called Bill’s women “bimbos” and “gold diggers” in Arkansas with the help of intimidating private investigators poking around in the lives of Bill’s women. (Ironic, given the righteous anger of the Clintons about Anita Hill during the H. W. Bush era, when Republicans slimed Anita Hill as “a little nutty and a little slutty.”)

Bill Clinton tried his usual trick of scapegoating, evoking J.F.K. and L.B.J. to newsman Melvin——an unpleasant echo of Clinton aides calling around to reporters during the 1998 spiral to say that J.F.K. had fooled around with young women at the White House. But by 1998, feminism had been flowering for 30 years. And J.F.K. was no role model in that regard.

......after the capricious behavior of Bill Clinton and the smearing of Clintonworld…...Bill Clinton has learned that his threadbare routine of maudlin self-pity and casting blame on everyone but himself doesn’t work anymore. The definition of “is” doesn’t depend on anything. It just is.


6 posted on 12/10/2018 6:18:36 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

Linda Tripp and others weren’t victimized by violent threats and intimidation from the Klinton Kamp?


7 posted on 12/10/2018 6:18:45 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committtee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz

Major slut opines about what is not sexual harassment when a Democrat does it.


11 posted on 12/10/2018 10:56:01 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("The word 'racist' is used to describe 'every Republican that's winning'" --Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson