[tenger]

You’d think FReepers would at least give it 10 posts to suggest the mass murder solution, but it came in under 5.

[bassmaner]

Repelling an invasion is not 'mass murder'.

What's your solution?

[mrmeyer]

Well we could let them stay at your house if you prefer

[Bell Bouy II]

Disappointed it took 5

[Uncle Miltie]

Most borders in the world are patrolled by armed border agents with instructions to arrest, or else shoot to kill.

We are just pansies.

[Boomer]

You’d think FReepers would at least give it 10 posts to suggest the mass murder solution, but it came in under 5.

If nothing else; we are a pragmatic bunch. ;)

I like the mini gun idea but there could be too much collateral damage so maybe fire bombs or flame throwers would be a better choice in this case.

[bigbob]

No, because many FReepers actually think the Potus will order the military to shoot to kill unarmed civilians. That’s what we’ve become.

[ez]

You speak of FReepers as if you are not one, yet here you are?

[hal ogen]

Using your sensitive “logic”, I guess the United States should have stayed out of WWII so they could avoid mass-murdering nazis and japs? Sheesh! Toughen-up, soy boy!

[luvbach1]

We will not be mowing them down. Tear gas (maybe) and physically capturing as many as possible as they rush by. The rest get through. More picked up as they roam San Ysidro (which is part of San Diego.

[so_real]

... give it 10 posts to suggest the mass murder solution, but it came in under 5.

Well, that's progress. When we have it down to 3 posts and the sentiment is held nation-wide, then we'll have our sovereignty back. Those who remember their history lessons know that being a free people has never been without self-sacrifice and bloodshed. At our greatest we were "one nation". We should all be nationalists once again.

[just me]

It’s not murder, it’s war.

[Don W]

The death of members of an invading force is not murder. They are referred to as casualties of war.

[riri]

They are leaving. Eventually. They can leave vertically or horizontally. Their choice.

[DesertRhino]

Why don’t you put on a dress and swish around for us?

[odawg]

No one has suggested mass murder here yet.

However, if someone were trying to break into your house and he was unarmed, would you just open your door and let him in because he was unarmed? How about ten unarmed? How about a mob of twenty unarmed?

When does the threat from a mass invasion become a threat as long as they are “unarmed”? Ten thousand? Twenty thousand? All with hostile intent.

They claim in the caravan they have a “right” to enter the U.S. that the U.S. is nothing, and that the U.S. is racist.

Looks like they can’t wait to vote for Hillary.

[Jeff Chandler]

You’d think FReepers would at least give it 10 posts to suggest the mass murder solution, but it came in under 5.

I miss the old days when we'd get suggestions for a moat with crocodiles.

[al baby]

Why?

[Repeat Offender]

You’d think FReepers would at least give it 10 posts to suggest the mass murder solution, but it came in under 5.

Is that you, Jeb! ? Here to educate us on compassionate conservatism, and how the invasion is really an act of love?

Maybe if these parasites didn't invade a sovereign country, they wouldn't have to worry about being repelled like an invading force.

Just a hint - 20,000 invaders is numerically than a Marine Division.

https://www.marines.mil/Portals/59/Publications/MCRP%205-12D%20Organization%20of%20Marine%20Corps%20Forces.pdf

But, Heaven forbid we use force to defend the country.

[PIF]

mass murder does not come into play when our country is being invades by 2 regiments of irregular troops - or would you just prefer to get rid of the southern border altogether (which is the alternative to using deadly force in this situation)?

[NorthMountain]

suggest the mass murder solution

What's your solution?

Welcome them with open legs?