“Seven of us were going toward not guilty and five of us going toward guilty on the murder charge. After some of us asked to watch the confession video again we voted again and it was the opposite way. Seven said guilty and five said not guilty.”
At that point, the forewoman sent a note saying the jurors were split — even though at least four of them opposed sending the message, the juror said.
“The note that was sent to the judge — we were all not in agreement to end it where it ended. The [forewoman] decided to send a note to ask for help and she was told that there is no way they could help us — to continue and see if we could change each other’s mind — and the note was still sent.
“A lot of people were upset that the note was sent to the judge at the time. Some of us wanted to think about it some more. That note was sent and people were not ready to end it there. People felt like there could have been more deliberations — the same way that two people changed their mind after seeing the video,” the juror said.
“Some of us were shocked, too, like what the hell just happened? It was upsetting. I’m not going to say I wasted my time, but i just feel like it should have been more time,” the juror said.
“It was kind of traumatic for me because I feel it was like a tragedy and I really wanted to see justice.”
Veteran lawyers, too, were floored that Aloise, who’s been a judge since 1999, didn’t send them back to deliberate.
“I have never seen [a mistrial] happen without an Allen charge. Never. The Allen charges normally work,” said defense attorney Sally Butler, a prosecutor in Queens for 15 years.
“Whenever you get that note, that’s the first thing the judge does. There was something definitely up.”
Civil rights lawyer Ron Kuby agreed that the outcome was “unheard of” given the short length of deliberations. “The first deadlock note, in my experience, never hangs the jury unless there is physical violence [among jurors] or other extraneous reasons,” Kuby said.
The panel had deliberated just one hour on Monday and 12 on Tuesday — after hearing a mountain of evidence against Lewis.
“Given the amount of deliberation compared with the length of the trial, it was not a particularly long deliberation,” Kuby noted.
What are the chances that this will be given a second trial?
If it happens, the prosecutor better find a different judge, or the result will be the same.
The defendant appears mentally deficient, but is he some sort of Muslim? That might account for such leniency by the judge.
Some judges will ‘bend over backwards’ to go easy on Muslims.
Just ask several abused children in England, who were told to keep quiet b/c it ‘might upset the new population’.
He had Thanksgiving plans. Can always seat a new jury after Mew Years. 8>P
What’s all the uproar about, just a few thousands of dollars and inconvenience ... /s/
The courts have failed the people
He is going to be retried.
I would far rather give the prosecution a chance to correct the problems the defense brought up and have a do-over than accept the results of a negotiation between jurors for conviction and jurors for acquittal, which might lead to an intermediate verdict (guilty of a lesser charge).
He is going back to jail for another 2 months and then another trial. The prosecution has a strong case and has seen the defense claims. They can now rebut those claims before they are presented, which should produce a just verdict.
I think everyone has it wrong. They are saying the Defense has an advantage after a mistrial, that’s true, but the Prosecution is at a real disadvantage if the jury votes to acquit. When there is an even split among jurors, it’s possible the acquit jurors can create doubt among those that think he’s guilty. Maybe this judge saw an OJ jury and said enough. The judge might have felt there is no way a “reasonable” person could overcome the DNA and a confession and think this guy is not guilty. Now, they get to try another jury instead of having the Prosecution spend years before appeals courts that would not reverse unless something grossly inappropriate happened.
OJ jury?
If I were her (the victims) family, I would hope and pray that the peep walks for whatever reason. I have three daughters and I have told every boy that they have ever had a relationship with, and their buddy’s, that if they ever harm my girls that I would put them into the ground. Yes, I tell them, that I would probably go to jail for the rest of my life - but you will be dead. Let that man walk and take care of it the way it should be.