Posted on 10/31/2018 6:39:05 AM PDT by SMGFan
So-called Birthright Citizenship, which costs our Country billions of dollars and is very unfair to our citizens, will be ended one way or the other. It is not covered by the 14th Amendment because of the words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Many legal scholars agree.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LzUMLf6YYM
Tucker Carlson October 30, 2018 -——
Watch from the beginning through the 12:30 mark. EXCELLENT
In this era; I’m gonna go with “filthy animals”.
Damn democrats.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
And Bush League Republicans.
Teddy was only 33 in 1965. He had just been elected to the Senate in 1962. He put the "junior" in junior senator. He wasn't authoring or advancing any legislation.
What really happened is the two authors of the '65 Hart–Celler act needed a pretty face to present to the general public. Otherwise, they would have been immediately outed for their intentional treason. Teddy fit the bill perfectly and took his pieces of silver.
His true reward was protection from the satanists who control(led) the media/financial conglomerates that Trump is fighting to this day. And, as we know, that support came in handy just a few years later ...
I’m not convinced that Roberts will vote with US.
WPA=We Piddle Around.
Never-Trumper Judge Napolitano said birthright citizenship can’t be ended.
—
Is that little troll on the right side of ANYTHING these days?
I favor birth right employment — where the employee decides where they work without the concent of the employer. All you have to do is illegally break into the business and you’re automatically an employee with full salary and benefits!
And birth right employment is in the 14th Amendment!
Ted Kennedy was the champion of this crap.
A VERY excellent few minute to explain the law and the Constitutional intent behind The President's possible plans concerning "birthright citizenship".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LzUMLf6YYM
“So your (sic) still holding out hope that legal/judicial challenges to an executive order will not survive the Supreme Court,...”
I’m not sure what I’m hoping for. The truth, I guess. How can that ever be a bad thing?
” even if you win more elections, the dems who remain will never vote give up their central-american voter pipeline.”
Maybe the Central-American voter pipeline will die of attrition if PDJT can solve the illegal alien problem. Legal Central-American voters who’ve come in the right way may not be inclined to support the Dems. Many support Trump now.
Anyhow, it’s an interesting time to be an American. Never a dull moment, and hopefully man wins!
When is that lame ass excuse for a judge as well as TV pundit ever right? Maybe its because his eyebrows get in the way of him seeing clearly
Believing someone born here is automatically an American citizen is like believing a boy born in a women’s rest room is automatically a girl.
There is surprisingly little germaine to the "subject to the jurisdiction" phrase. Like the 2A militia reference, it was apparently so commonly understood at the time that it needed no debate. Such as there was revolved mostly on whether or not Indians on reservations subject to tribal law were covered.
Relevant discussion begins on p.44 of the linked document. Some excerpts:
Sen Howard, who introduced the amendment to the floor understood it not to include children of foreigners. In fact, he understood it not to include Indians on reservations as the reservations were quasi-foreign states.
Sen. Trumbull asserts: "What do we mean by "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?" Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means."
Sen. Johnson observes: "Now, all that this amendment provides is, that all persons born in the United States and not subject to someforeign Power— for that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who have brought the matter before us — shall be considered as citizens of the United States. That would seem to be not only a wise but a necessary provision. If there are to be citizens of the United States entitled everywhere to the character of citizens of theUnited States there should be some certain definition of what citizenship is, what has created the character of citizen as between himself and the United States, and the amendment says that citizenship may depend upon birth,and I know of no better way to give rise to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of the UnitedStates, born of parents who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States."
I believe this is covered in the Convention of States efforts. One of the amendments proposed to be considered. All need to get behind that movement and get their individual states to sign on to it. The Convention of States is the quickest way things like this can be taken care of.
“It’s worked great so far”
That’s the other side. They want reverse nation building where third world cultures come in and make us like them.
We have lots of people here on FR that believe the children of foreigners are not only citizens, but natural born citizens eligible to be President.
More important than the wall!
“Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.”
*****************************************
Precisely why natural born citizens can only be produced by citizens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.