Posted on 09/26/2018 7:52:20 PM PDT by doug from upland
The people she actually named have all denied it.
true
LOL....maybe it’ll now be Garrett’s word against Blowsey’s as to whether he attacked her, or not.
Blowsey: Nah, he’s not the guy who drunkenly tried to remove my clothes.
Garrett: Oh, yes I am!! It was me! I did to do that, at my own house, during a wild party with three other people.
Who’s to say who is telling the truth????
Coincidently, Garrett and Mark Judge are also friends, so the second man could still be Mark Judge. Judge wrote a book about his alcoholism, partying and binge drinking in high school, so he would fit that part of Ford's story too...
Look at post 71.
I posted on FR that Ed Whelan didnt recant. He just apologized to the man he named as the actual attacker.
The purpose was to box Ford into a specific denial that this other guy was the attacker.
I expect hes the man who testified to the Senate and his friend was one of those named as a witness and backed him up.
This will clear Kavanaugh if true and Ford has lied publicly about the event even when informed of the truth.
WIll find out.
Enough already. Time for the entire football to speak up.
... team ...
“Were you waiting for your turn?”
Throw the whole case away. You go, Shemeka!
If Kavanaugh is not conformed because of the sexual accusations, how can he possibly be fit to sit on the Court now? The chain of fall out will continue for years.
No, she’ll want to get outta Dodge asap before her #MeToo sisters turn on her. I wouldn’t be eating out at a DC restaurant if I were her.
Second guy may be the other guy in the room.
Under aged drinking is illegal from 1 year old to 17 years old. Duh.
There's a whole lotta coincidences going on.
This was a few years after Swetnick's ex-boyfriend had her charged with domestic violence.
I shall refrain from comment about Swetnick's sparkly gold under-eyeliner.
She couldn’t admit it was Garrett, or anyone else, after she’d already made such a bit to do that it was Kavanaugh. Besides, Soros would be wanting his $$$ back.
Probably the second guy is the other boy in the room.
Very true.
Bingo!
Probably the second guy is the other boy in the room.
/
/
Ah HA!
man, I’m wondering if we have the makings of a Hollywood movie. You can’t make this stuff up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.