Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: x
But Ms. Ramirez stated that she touched the genitals of the person who was nude. That act is a sexual assault, unless the person she touched consented to the contact.

I doubt a court would take that very seriously.

I think your analysis is wrong. If you want to find out how wrong just go to some event where women are exposing their genitals, such as a performance of Hair, or a strip club and go ahead and touch them. I think the DA will take it very seriously.

65 posted on 09/25/2018 6:22:52 AM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: freeandfreezing
You think the guy was just standing there like an art installation?

I don't know why we're talking about something that probably never happened or it it did didn't involve Kavanaugh, but she alleges that the man came up to her and shoved his penis towards her or "thrust it in her face." That could be considered assault itself, as well as indecent exposure. She says she pushed him away, a somewhat natural reaction.

Thrusting can be construed assault even if you don't connect (which would make it battery). Even without the thrusting or shoving in her direction, if you are walking around naked in what was most likely not your room, you aren't likely to be successful if you bring an assault case because someone pushes you away.

66 posted on 09/25/2018 6:36:18 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson