Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Ellison pointed to the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, saying that he is innocent and has not been proved guilty and that there is an ongoing review being conducted by the Democratic Party.

Feinstein is on the case? Chuckles Schumer? Hillary? Who?

1 posted on 09/22/2018 7:16:52 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather
Maybe Grassley 🤔🙃
2 posted on 09/22/2018 7:18:27 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The chick said it was true so it’s true Just ask Judge Kavvanaugh.


3 posted on 09/22/2018 7:22:01 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

One thread asserted Monahan was exhibiting police reports naming Ellison.

How is he going to refute the paper trail?


4 posted on 09/22/2018 7:22:30 PM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

If he’s innocent, he’d demand an investigation by the FBI.

Because that’s what innocent people do.


6 posted on 09/22/2018 7:27:10 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

What a weasel lawyer answer...

+++++

Will there be any other women coming forward with accusations?

“There is absolutely nobody that I’m aware of that has ever made a credible allegation,” Ellison said.


7 posted on 09/22/2018 7:27:18 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

There is another credible complaint against Ellison in 2005, I think it was. A woman went to the police and filed a charge against him. It is part of the public record.


9 posted on 09/22/2018 7:34:46 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Be aware that Ellison had a very credible opponent this time. It is Doug Wardlow. He is campaigning hard ever sine last summer, as a matter of fact. However, with the Twin Cities’ liberal news media it is difficult for Doug to get all the negative news abut Ellison in front of the outstate electorate.

Please consider donating to Doug Wardlow to help send Keith home packing for good. He wants to make our state a sanctuary state. Outstate Minnesota went for Trump by about 65% on the average for each county. But Trump was uniquely able to get his vision out to the people by going around the news media. Running against a man who has a famous name is a problem with some rural people not fully aware of Ellison’s radicalism.


10 posted on 09/22/2018 7:40:08 PM PDT by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Ellison is a protected species. Liberals must do everything possible to insure his survival.

Can’t go around indicting or accusing a member of the Muslim community, especially when he’s a member of congress, and more especially when he’s of the liberal variety.


11 posted on 09/22/2018 7:41:40 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“Hillary Clinton: It would be ‘very easy’ for FBI to investigate the Keith Ellison allegations.”


12 posted on 09/22/2018 7:52:57 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Sixth Amendment of the Constitution...innocent until proven guilty

What sort of BALDERDASH and FOLDEROL is this? Everybody knows the Constitution is a living, breathing thing malleable to the needs of the times. Everybody also knows the seriousness of the charges is what matters, not facts, not evidence, not due process, and certainly NOT the Sixth. What is the matter with this guy Ellison? He should quit now.

13 posted on 09/22/2018 8:13:48 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

“Ellison pointed to the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, saying that he is innocent and has not been proved guilty and that there is an ongoing review being conducted by the Democratic Party.”

Hahahaha. I guess Ellison is screwed because the dem criteria for guilt in a sexual assault case is the woman is always to be believed. Not however if the male aggressor is a black muslim, particularly if he is a Dem running for office in which case the woman is to be presumed to have been the sexual aggressive against herself.


14 posted on 09/22/2018 8:19:27 PM PDT by chuckee (extended beyond the time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Thanks for the post, quite welcome.


16 posted on 09/22/2018 8:57:13 PM PDT by Sam_Damon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Taqiyya. ellison din’t do nuffin’ because of this old muslim trick.


17 posted on 09/22/2018 9:12:48 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

I wish the ex girlfriend would go ahead and come out with tape/video she’s supposed to have.


19 posted on 09/23/2018 2:45:44 AM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson