Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Behind the Blue Wall

“but they also can generally accept less, because they’re ultimately usually sending or bringing that money back to someplace with a lower cost of living. For those reasons, there is obviously an incentive for employers to discriminate against U.S. workers in favor of temporary foreign workers.”

Perhaps, but a company in San Francisco, where the cost of living in extremely high, can hire workers in Tupelo, Mississippi, where the cost of living is low.

Companies should have the right to buy the highest quality but cheapest labor in the marketplace.


19 posted on 07/31/2018 10:05:24 AM PDT by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Blue House Sue
Companies should have the right to buy the highest quality but cheapest labor in the marketplace.

Quality seldom enters into the equations. Cheapest does.

24 posted on 07/31/2018 10:15:23 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Blue House Sue

The question is the “marketplace”. In past days, slavery was legal. “Companies” (mostly individuals back then I suppose) had “the right to buy the highest quality but cheapest labor in the marketplace.” Part of the reason the North and the Republicans prohibited slavery in their territory and ultimately couldn’t tolerate it even in the South was that the “marketplace” for labor was artificially tilted against laborers by the fact that there was a large class of them with no bargaining power whatsoever.

We have much the same thing going on now with illegal immigration. Again, “companies” have “the right to buy the highest quality but cheapest labor in the marketplace”, but the marketplace has been artificially tilted against laborers by the fact that there is a large class of them with no bargaining power whatsoever.

Temporary foreign workers is certainly better than slavery and illegal immigration, but it’s still of a piece. They don’t have any ability to change employers, so their bargaining power is limited, so to the extent that they’re in the “marketplace”, the marketplace is artificially titled against labor.

I don’t think those of us who are concerned about these issues are asking for special protections for workers; we just want an even playing field in the marketplace for labor where there isn’t a government-sanctioned, imported class of laborers with fewer rights and thus less bargaining power than the rest.


25 posted on 07/31/2018 10:16:11 AM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Blue House Sue

Are you willing to compete against H1B realtors who live four to an efficiency or 1-bedroom apartment?


42 posted on 07/31/2018 10:40:53 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Blue House Sue
Companies should have the right to buy the highest quality but cheapest labor in the US marketplace.

Fixed.

57 posted on 07/31/2018 11:26:03 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson