It continues to be obvious that CRIME PAYS in Washington, DC.
I think it probably has been pulled already.
I’m a former intelligence official and I wonder the same thing.
Given that people like Brennan, Clinton, etc had security clearances, aren’t there levels of what you’d be able to see?
For example, Brennan would forseeably have a high level of clearance because he was CIA Director and Clinton would foreseeably have a high level of clearance because of her State Department position.
But wouldn’t or shouldn’t there be a limit to what either could view? In other words, there’d be some compartmentalization in that Clinton wouldn’t be able to see certain files because they weren’t relevant to her.
Just wondering...
Stripping Hillary?
What a horrible vision!
I am currently unofficially intelligent, and I would have yanked her security clearance so hard she’d have a pantsuit wedgie.
Every single Obama admin associated person still holding a clearance should have been stripped thereof on Day One . Certainly now....INCLUDING Barack Jerkoff Obama .
Where’s she gonna get classified information these days, from the squirrels on her walks in the woods or out of a scotch bottle?
I ask this because she spent the better part of her time in the White House repelling every effort to let the agents responsible for securing those clearances to do their jobs. Almost all of the people who worked with her between 1993 to 2000 did not have security clearances.
One roadblock after another and even Huma never got a security clearance when she was working with her at State. Hillary crowed bigtime in how inventive she was in making up excuses to the agent why Huma could not meet with him.
I think this question needs to be answered.
If I am correct, then she should have not handled ANY top secret documents at any time whatsoever.
We should not take it for granted that she has a bonafide security clearance.
Additionally, there is a cost factor maintaining a security clearance for each individual. At least that's what I was told when I was debriefed from TS (because I didn't need it), only to be rebriefed 18 months later when I needed it again.
Also, we were subject to re-investigations and possible polygraphs after a period of time in order to maintain our clearances. What about Hillary and gang?
It is unbelievable that hillary still is cleared. Same for hussein, if he is.
I have to agree..... Shocked. Why does this woman have a Security Clearance?
If a junior decon technician at the most remote nuclear plant was ever accused of busting up a motel room and ruining furniture, …. etc., …. let alone selling Uranium ore(s) to the Soviets, funding false documents, mishandling classified information, refusing to help our overseas embassy along with the Benghazi event. .. etc., Their Clearance would be REVOKED within a matter of HOURS!
What in God’s GREEN EARTH is Wrong with the DC Security people???
Her security clearance should have been yanked the instant it was known she was utilizing her own private server. There really is no question about that. If indeed the FBI was interested in “exhonerating” her, that would have been a de minimus action. But of course it was not done. She was in essence granted the exemption to use her own server, AFTER she had signed the standard declaration before assumning the office of the SoS that she understood what “classified” meant and that she understood the ramifications of violating the regs thereon.
Six years later, when Comey announced she had been found to have classified info on said server, the correct action would have been to.....do nothing, of course.
A year later, when she lost the election, her clearance should have been revoked on the spot.
But you see, every potential post-facto revocation we can talk about immediately calls into question why the hell her clearance wasn’t revoked on the prior reg violation. Or the earlier one. Or the prior one. Or the one that came before that.
PLEASE DO NOT USE THE WORDS, “STRIPPING HILLARY CLINTON” IN A HEAD LINE AGAIN! I had a vomit episode...thanks.
Sometimes it’s better to leave the security clearance in place and feed the recipient false information. #justsayin
Will Hillary leave it to Chelsea in her Will or does Chelsea already have her own ?
So am I.
For someone who the FBI found to be extremely careless with classified documentation, you’d think she’d be at the TOP of such a list...
But that would make sense in the REAL world...
You get to keep your security unless action is taken to strip it
I want all of the previous three administration folks stripped
I wonder if they are getting security briefs, like the president, or if they simply have a clearance and could request data, but that request would be reviewed for need. Why, for example, would somebody who is retired “need to know,” say, the disposition of human intel assets in Syria? Or, the estimated number of nuclear weapons in Israel? (Carter revealed the number, which had been a secret since day one. I hope they pulled his clearance.)
“Hillary Clinton” and “stripping” don’t belong in the same sentence.