Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yesthatjallen
They need to get a clue. The Supreme Court has said multiple times that the police have no duty to protect any particular individual.
18 posted on 07/11/2018 3:16:28 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Enjoy the decline of the American empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: backwoods-engineer

“They need to get a clue. The Supreme Court has said multiple times that the police have no duty to protect any particular individual. “

Except for their own sorry asses. They are so special don’t you know.


24 posted on 07/11/2018 3:25:48 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: backwoods-engineer

“The Supreme Court has said multiple times that the police have no duty to protect any particular individual”

That gives police license not to do do jack...especially if it involves danger to themselves. Just let the public take care of business and stick to sitting radar in speed traps. That would save a lot of innocent people and dog lives as a bonus.


27 posted on 07/11/2018 3:33:34 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson