[Lagmeister]

Isn't this just covering for the DOJ employee (as in the rank 'n file) who used government records, at work, to verify their target's meal location? Then, used 'verbal assaults' on private property to prevent a 'free exercise' of their target's movements?

Using government time and resources is not a 'personal' action and 'verbal assaults' on private property during a contractual event (ordering a meal) is not a 'valid protest' as I understand it. Am I wrong?

[Rebelbase]

” the DOJ employee (as in the rank ‘n file) who used government records, at work, to verify their target’s meal location? “

First I’ve head of that. Can you point the way to a link with more details?