Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Yeah, Roberts avoided the issue that it was not just a tax but a mandate attached


7 posted on 06/18/2018 12:04:36 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JudgemAll

A tax on not having something. Who would have thunk!
And what return do I get from said tax? The Citizen is supposed to get something back from the guberment for the tax paid - right?


29 posted on 06/18/2018 7:19:03 PM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: JudgemAll

“… in the 2012 decision upholding the legality of the Obamacare individual mandate, Chief Justice John Roberts cast the tie-breaking vote in favor of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate on the basis that the penalty imposed for not having ‘qualifying’ health insurance is not a fine, penalty, or fee, but rather a tax. Since Congress has the power to tax, Roberts reasoned, it has the power to impose the individual mandate.”

When I heard the supreme court decision on this I said that if this meets the test of the constitution then there is NOTHING that can NOT be done. They could just as reasonably require that everyone buy a quart of buttermilk once a week. How could there be any limit on governmental power?


32 posted on 06/19/2018 4:18:48 AM PDT by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson