Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court sidesteps decision on partisan gerrymandering in rulings on WI, MD cases
Washington Post ^ | Jun 18, 2018 | Robert Barnes

Posted on 06/18/2018 8:08:14 AM PDT by 11th_VA

The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped a decision on when partisan gerrymandering goes too far, ruling against the challengers of a Republican-drawn map in Wisconsin and a Democratic redistricting in Maryland.

The decisions in the separate cases once again puts off a decision on when courts can find that partisan efforts to keep parties in power goes so far as to be unconstitutional.

It was a technical resolution of what has seemed to hold the promise of being a landmark decision about whether extreme efforts to give one party advantage over another were unconstitutional.

While the court routinely polices the drawing of electoral maps to combat racial gerrymandering, it has never found that partisan eforts went too far. It has never settled on a test that judges could use to determine how much politics was too much.

There is a pending challenge of North Carolina’s redistricting efforts that could provide another case for the justices to consider the issue.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: gerrymandering; lawsuit; scotus; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: 11th_VA; 100American; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


21 posted on 06/18/2018 12:58:33 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks ( The US Constitution ....... Invented by geniuses and God .... Administered by morons ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA; AuH2ORepublican; LS; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; ...

Good news!!


22 posted on 06/18/2018 5:04:25 PM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Which was even worse, given the lawless Democrat PA Supremes.


23 posted on 06/18/2018 5:21:30 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Impy

The Maryland gerrymandering should be struck down. Our side should have at least 3 of the 8 seats. Of course, the damage was done with their failure to stop the theft of 5 House seats in PA by the lawless Democrat-Fascist court.


24 posted on 06/18/2018 5:23:12 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj ("It's Slappin' Time !")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy

Better both suits dismissed than both upheld.

As much as I’d to see Maryland gerrymandering overturned if that would be used as precedent to mess with GOP maps in the states we control it would not be worth it.


25 posted on 06/18/2018 6:49:27 PM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; BillyBoy

SCOTUS remanding for lack of standing not only makes it more difficult for RATs to assert a colorable claim of injury based on redistricting plans that “underrepresent” the RATs when looking at it statewide, it also buys us time for either Justice Kennedy to retire or for Mother Nature to create a vacancy in a Leftist-held seat that President Trump will fill with a conservative who will be the fifth vote to put an end to lawsuits claiming political gerrymandering once and for all.

As for the MD redistricing map, it is a travesty, but thee’s nothing unconstitutional about it. Let the RATs gerrymander MD to their heart’s content, so long as we get to do it in all of those states that we control; we’ll come out ahead by a few dozen seats.


26 posted on 06/18/2018 7:08:07 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 11th_VA

Not sure if this sites bias.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2018/06/symposium-no-closer-to-consensus/#more-271445


27 posted on 06/19/2018 12:56:08 AM PDT by SMGFan (Sarah Michelle Gellar is on twitter @SarahMGellar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson