Why all the hubub? That number is less than guns killing people in the same numbers daily right? That's what they would have you believe. Remember demolibs, NOH8! LOL!
1 posted on
06/17/2018 8:51:35 AM PDT by
rktman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: rktman
What’s your death rate? One apiece.
2 posted on
06/17/2018 8:55:08 AM PDT by
the_daug
To: rktman
How many people have died in Syria alone? And why?
3 posted on
06/17/2018 8:55:17 AM PDT by
BobL
(I drive a pick up truck because it makes me feel like a man)
To: rktman
I thought people dieing is good for the planet.
4 posted on
06/17/2018 8:55:53 AM PDT by
dila813
(Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!)
To: rktman
Not a scientist. That’s just a liberal political hack.
5 posted on
06/17/2018 8:56:29 AM PDT by
CodeToad
To: rktman
They are wrong! DJT’S policies will kill everyone! RUN NOW!
6 posted on
06/17/2018 8:58:17 AM PDT by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: rktman
Less than what is killed by socialism.
Just think how many fireman lives will be saved if we stop sending them into burning buildings.
7 posted on
06/17/2018 8:58:59 AM PDT by
fruser1
To: rktman
Perhaps the scientists could perform a study on how creating government regulations that hamper innovation and progress costs even more lives? Perish the thought. exactly! Same with gun regulation pc logic they forget how many lives are saved because of guns.
9 posted on
06/17/2018 9:04:30 AM PDT by
the_daug
To: rktman
They’re always complaining about overpopulation, but when somebody does something about it, they complain some more. You can’t win....
To: rktman
12 posted on
06/17/2018 9:05:10 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: rktman
My gosh... I guess I will say something outrageous about Trump's policies SAVING 80,000 lives. Think they'll post it?
Me either...
13 posted on
06/17/2018 9:06:08 AM PDT by
Deplorable American1776
(Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
To: rktman
Which 80,000? There’s a lot of people we could do without.
14 posted on
06/17/2018 9:06:25 AM PDT by
umgud
To: rktman
“Scientists”??? No! Not by any stretch of the imagination, except in the sick heads of libtards.
16 posted on
06/17/2018 9:07:40 AM PDT by
miniTAX
To: rktman
Would that be 80,000 of the Deplorables or the Cabal? LOL.
17 posted on
06/17/2018 9:07:44 AM PDT by
Kalamata
(bibleresearchtools.com)
To: rktman
I believe these ‘scientists’ DID NOT stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night or anytime...
18 posted on
06/17/2018 9:08:56 AM PDT by
Deplorable American1776
(Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is, too. :-))
To: rktman
of the roughly 24,000,000 that will normally die in that same period. . .yea. . .80,000 is on Trump. . .right!
19 posted on
06/17/2018 9:10:30 AM PDT by
McBuff
(To be, rather than to seem)
To: rktman
There are clearly legitimate environmental concerns, and I have zero doubt that if and when presented with legitimate scientific evidence that something should be done about a specific environmental concern, Trump will be on board.
The reality is that by politicizing everything to push their own agenda, those on the left - including scientists on the left - have diminished the credibility of science and have made it much harder to actually find a consensus on things that we need to find consensus on.
To: rktman
How many are dying per decade because of abortion?
22 posted on
06/17/2018 9:15:57 AM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: rktman
Meanwhile abortions, car accidents, death from smoking, etc etc is not mentioned.
23 posted on
06/17/2018 9:16:32 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: rktman
Here's one of the "scientists"...Cutler graduated from Harvard College, summa cum laude, with a degree in Economics, and then joined the Harvard faculty after receiving his Ph.D. in Economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1991.[3] He served in the administration of Bill Clinton and was the senior health care advisor to Barack Obama.
To: rktman
I guess people were healthier living in poverty under obamas dismal eight years. Better known as the glory years for the global warming grant grubbing scientists. They miss the easy money for making stuff up.
29 posted on
06/17/2018 9:28:19 AM PDT by
robel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson