This article really has to be read in its entirety in order to get what he is saying. Excepts are going to lead to incorrect conclusions on what the article is about. Some articles are just written that way. So please read the whole thing if you are interested.
Thanks for the post I see what you mean good article to read completely. This Horowitz seems rather weaselly
It’s a half baked report.
Good find !
What bothers me is that if we had the same number of FBI employees saying the same things about blacks as they did about Trump voters, Horowitz would have no problem deciding if there was “bias”, or if that bias “changed the investigation outcome”.
Under the “Horowitz standard”, if wants to, he will always be able to justify or excuse the most merciless punitive prosecution, or the most outrageous non-investigation investigation.
That also means that the Horowitz “investigation” of the FISA warrants, Trump campaign infiltration, FBI non-recovery of text messages will get the same treatment.
My only comfort is that every time these Swamp creatures pull off some dirty, unfair move, it ends up helping Trump in the end.