I’m not a lawyer but have enough knowledge of the law to be dangerous when I post on it, so I will ask attorneys on the thread to correct me if I’m wrong. I think the Federal Rules of Procedure (Rule 11?) require that any attorney filing motions and evidence in a case has to swear to the validity of the evidence so presented. If millions of the documents are in Russian and there is no translation, how can that be considered as ethical and legal under the FROC???
Is the next move by the defense attorneys to ask for sanctions and fines on Mueller’s team??? The Courts don’t approve motions for sanctions very often as it endangers an attorney’s career reputation, but even a filing is sufficient to bring the infraction of a “fake filing” to the attention of the Court and public. Correct or not?
I don’t think they are affirming the contents of the discovery.
They affirm that it IS the discovery.