Skip to comments.
Two Classes, Divided by ‘I Do’
New York Times ^
| July 14, 2012
| JASON DePARLE
Posted on 06/07/2018 2:45:47 PM PDT by grundle
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
1
posted on
06/07/2018 2:45:47 PM PDT
by
grundle
To: grundle
Even a non-collage educated couple has a better chance then a collage educated single.
The moral of the story is get married and then have children.
2
posted on
06/07/2018 2:49:14 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
( Bunnies, bunnies, it must be bunnies!! Or maybe midgets....)
To: grundle
Has the NY Slimes come down on the side of responsible “Ward & June Cleaver” lifestyles?
3
posted on
06/07/2018 2:49:27 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(You Say "White Privilege"...I Say "Protestant Work Ethic")
To: grundle
Where’s ‘daddy’.................or ‘daddies’?.................
4
posted on
06/07/2018 2:49:38 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(When Obama and VJ go to prison for treason, will Roseanne get her show back?...)
To: grundle
Stupid people don’t get married before they go to bed with someone.
This is news?
5
posted on
06/07/2018 2:50:02 PM PDT
by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Traditional values exist because they were good rules to live by, who knew?
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
They are not divided by ‘I Do’, they are divided by ‘I DID’..................
7
posted on
06/07/2018 2:50:35 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(When Obama and VJ go to prison for treason, will Roseanne get her show back?...)
To: grundle
Two Classes, Divided by I Do Separated by Commitment. Fixed.
8
posted on
06/07/2018 2:52:52 PM PDT
by
lightman
(ANTIFA is full of Bolshevik.)
To: grundle
It is the privileged Americans who are marrying, and marrying helps them stay privileged, said Andrew Cherlin, a sociologist at Johns Hopkins University.
I am so glad I do not have an advanced degree and work for a University, they must be required to show they are an idiot.
9
posted on
06/07/2018 2:54:24 PM PDT
by
Jolla
To: grundle
10
posted on
06/07/2018 2:54:59 PM PDT
by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
To: grundle
They’re trying to shame people with intact families and trying to create more single moms on welfare. I remember an article 1-2 years ago that was shaming parents that read to their children because other kids didn’t have that.
11
posted on
06/07/2018 2:56:58 PM PDT
by
Trillian
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Goal of Times and their fellow Marxists: transfer of income from Faulkner to Schairer. It’s gotta be Faulker’s fault.
To: Truthsearcher
Yep.
There is a reason why it was the norm to get married and then have children even in non-Christian societies. It just made sense.
Even those societies that allowed for premarital sex the sex was preMARITAL. When the girl got pregnant you got married and settled down to raise your children.
Now it is hop in the sack at the drop of a hat and forget about such silly things as commitment. And as for carefully selecting your mate? Oh no. You should only consider the tingling in your loins.
13
posted on
06/07/2018 2:59:26 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
( Bunnies, bunnies, it must be bunnies!! Or maybe midgets....)
14
posted on
06/07/2018 3:02:31 PM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Make American Intelligence Great Again.)
To: grundle
I foresee a government program to provide husbands for single mothers. It just needs a catchy acronym.
15
posted on
06/07/2018 3:03:00 PM PDT
by
webheart
(Grammar police on the scene.)
To: grundle
It’s a shame there was nothing Ms. Schairer could have done to avoid her situation. This was simply bad luck for her. Unavoidable. As for the Faulkners, with their stable, married family, they didn’t build that. It simply happened.
16
posted on
06/07/2018 3:06:01 PM PDT
by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: Red Badger
...no child support...
Why is this???
And, its not true. I am paying their child support. So are you, the reader.
17
posted on
06/07/2018 3:10:00 PM PDT
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day")
To: grundle
Ms. Schairer chose poorly.
18
posted on
06/07/2018 3:10:07 PM PDT
by
henkster
(Monsters from the Id.)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Now it is hop in the sack at the drop of a hat and shred the "products of conception" with a dull knife.
Baby-murder is the inevitable consequence of widely accepted and practiced promiscuity.
19
posted on
06/07/2018 3:12:13 PM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: Socon-Econ
20
posted on
06/07/2018 3:12:18 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(The USA news industry, the MSM-13, takes a machete to the truth. {h/t TigersEye})
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson