The headline says the agent is ready to testify, but the article doesn’t say that.
It says that Grassley has requested the agent’s testimony, which is not the same thing at all.
Supposedly he asked to be subpoenaed. Cant testify voluntarily.
I heard Dan Bongino referencing this today, and he said there are likely people who want to talk, but cannot because of what happens to whistleblowers. He said he has seen it happen.
If you know something bad that reflects poorly on your organization, it is a death sentence professionally speaking. They come after you and find a way to fire you for cause.
If you know something bad and leak it to the press, they polygraph EVERYONE. He said he has had to go through a few of them himself, so he knows.
(I think he has inside info on this)
He said that under the protection of a subpoena, he is pretty sure that people will talk, because...they can’t lie, and would welcome the chance to be able to do so.
So there may be something to this. We’ll see.