Posted on 05/09/2018 9:51:37 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
The nuclear deal hasn’t reduced Tehran’s threat to international security and stability.
Highly controversial? Yes. But President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)—also known as the Iran nuclear deal—was totally justifiable.
The deal was a well-intentioned effort by the Obama administration to limit Iran’s nuclear program—including its nuclear weapons program. But from the beginning, there were a number of reasonable concerns about the JCPOA.
How About That Sunset?
One of the most problematic provisions of the JCPOA is that it ends —or “sunsets”—after a specified period of time. At the fifteen-year mark of the agreement, Iran is no longer bound by the JCPOA.
The fact is that Tehran didn’t sign up to limit its nuclear-power (or weapons) program forever, but rather for just a period before being unbridled from the JCPOA. The JCPOA essentially kicks the can down the road to the next president after Trump.
Iran needs to sign up to limiting its nuclear activities in perpetuity.
Going Ballistic
Despite early calls for it to do so, the JCPOA doesn’t fully address Iran’s ballistic-missile program. Ballistic missiles are a common delivery system for weapons of mass destruction, especially nuclear weapons.
Since Iran lacks a highly capable global—or regional—Navy or Air Force, Tehran would have to rely on its ballistic-missile arsenal to deliver nuclear weapons against any of its self-perceived enemies, including the United States.
The concerns over Iran’s missile program is evident in UN Security Council Resolutions 1929 and 2231, which attempt to limit Iran’s activities involving nuclear-capable ballistic missiles. Tehran has been accused of violating both resolutions.
Restrictions on ballistic missiles must be part of any new, comprehensive agreement.
Hide-and-Seek
Another troubling aspect of the JCPOA is that the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors aren’t allowed to check Iranian military sites. This is beyond comprehension.
Since nations would likely—even probably—develop nuclear weapons within the context of a military program, it is only reasonable to expect that inspectors would be able to visit military sites where illicit nuclear activities may be taking place.
Verification of compliance is essential. Iran historically hasn’t been fully forthcoming on its nuclear activities, including its weapons program—a fact recently buttressed by revelations uncovered by Israeli intelligence operations. Tehran may still be hiding unauthorized activities beyond the inspectors’ purview.
Comprehensive, no-notice inspections need to be part of any future agreement.
Bad Behavior
While admittedly not part of the JCPOA, Iran’s destabilizing activities abroad are deeply troubling. The nuclear deal arguably hasn’t appreciably reduced Iran’s threat to international security and stability.
But Iran has become more fully integrated into the international economy with the lifting of punitive economic sanctions under the JCPOA. This has provided it with revenue streams that are helping fund its aggressive adventurism in the region.
Iran is supporting the ruthless regime in Syria in the bloody civil war there. Tehran is also aiding the Houthis rebels in Yemen, allowing them to indiscriminately rain missiles down on Saudi Arabia.
Iran, of course, is an active state sponsor of terrorism, supporting the likes of Hezbollah and Hamas, according to the U.S. government. In Afghanistan, it’s supporting some elements of the Taliban, continuing to destabilize the long, war-torn country.
Bottom-line: Iran is very dangerous.
Despite the American withdrawal from the JCPOA, there is still time for diplomacy while the U.S. economic sanctions—that will go after a broad range of Iranian economic activities—are reimposed.
While a parade of European leaders made their way recently to Washington to preserve the JCPOA, these same senior officials could now engage in the diplomatic heavy lifting of getting new negotiations started, especially considering their less-hostile relations with Iran.
President Trump made the right call. For the sake of American and international security and interests, a new nuclear deal is needed—one that addresses, at a minimum, the glaring flaws in the current JCPOA.
The first step toward a new agreement is the recent U.S. withdrawal from the nuclear deal. The next thoughtful step is for Iran to willingly come back to the table to tackle these fundamental and reasonable concerns.
Dr. Peter Brookes is a Heritage Foundation senior fellow and a former deputy assistant secretary of defense.
2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Remember when we used to have treaties?
Before the Bush League Republicans turned the Constitution on its head for the Kenyanesian Usurper.
This really is the crux right here. What we have here is a supposed arms treaty with no provision for independent inspection, hence no possibility of enforcement, hence no treaty. It is the pretense of a treaty, signed on these ridiculous terms by people in Washington D.C. who were desperate for the appearance of a deal, no matter how fake.
In the midst of that sea, I wish one of the chattering class would say “not sure; let’s wait and see what happens”. But they’re not getting paid for their humility.
Rush just stated that Iran never signed the deal. How is that possible? How could and why would Obama give them $1.5B in cash if they never signed onto the deal? What does this mean?
Ya, that gets me too. The Senate never ratified it as treaties are required to be approved , by a 2/3 vote of the Senate.
Begs lots of questions as to why this was legal in the first place.
In my opinion, the dangerous Iran fiasco was Obama’s bend over diplomacy aka lunacy used against We The People.
I cannot blame the Iranians for not agreeing to this. No nation valuing its sovereignty can allow unlimited inspections of its military. Even Iran has a right to defend itself.
Supposedly, the $1.(7) billion was a court settlement payment for the money we took from the Shah of Iran for F-14 Tomcats that were never delivered after the Revolution.
According to the Obummer administration, Iran couldn't access any western banking accounts, so the money had to be delivered in cash.
Utter BS and everyone knows it. That $400 million on Swiss Francs and Euros went to line the pockets of the mullahs and to pay off terrorist sleeper cells.
Rush is brilliantly informing the public of the hidden fact that IRAN NEVER SIGNED the agreement! Any hick from the sticks knows that an agreement has to have signatures of both parties to be valid, but it takes Ivy League geniuses such as Obama and Kerry to think they had an “agreement” when the paper was only signed by Obama and Kerry!
Why didn’t the American people know about this Fake Agreement? Because the Democrat media hid the fact that it was unsigned.
Pres. Trump should have never considered this sham deal, because it deserved no such consideration. Right after his inauguration, he should have called the Democrat media in to see him put it in an official government shredder.
>> The deal was a well-intentioned effort by the Obama administration
With undisclosed pallets of hard cash to grease the deal.
Why do people keep saying things like this?
I can't think of one single thing Obama did that was "well intentioned." Everything Obama did had an ulterior motive.
-PJ
The deal was a well-intentioned effort by the Obama administration to limit Iran’s nuclear program...
Horse hockey. Legacy chasing at best, treason at worst.
The fact is that Tehran didn’t sign up to limit its nuclear-power (or weapons) program forever...
Pony pellets. Iran didn't sign on for ANYTHING. They didn't sign the 'agreement.' Neither did Obammy.
There's no there, there.
There was no ‘deal’,... it was an agreement between obama and himself- Iran never signed anything, Congress never was given it to ‘ratify’...
Re: cash payment - if that is all true, then why was it done in hiding? If it was all on the up-and-up, they wouldn’t have needed to sneak it in. How dumb do they think we are?
As soon as I read “the deal was a good-intention effort by the Obama Administration...” I stopped reading. More lies and fake news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.