Replies

Wait, states can overrule their voters AFTER an election is over? Is this even legal? What Constitutional basis allows them to wait until Hilary loses the electoral vote but wins the popular vote, and then retroactively swiches those electoral votes to overturn A duly elected Donald Trump?

This stinks to high heaven. The commie Rats know no courtesy or lawfulness. They are flat out gangsters.

“Wait, states can overrule their voters AFTER an election is over? Is this even legal?”

States with a winner take all status already overrule their voters. Each Congressional District has one electoral vote. With a winner take all status all electoral votes go to the candidate who wins the statewide vote. Congressional Districts which voted for the other candidate are overruled.

We really need an amendment that requires that electoral votes be assigned by the vote in each Congressional District. The two votes per Senator could be assigned by the legislature of each state. go to popular vote.

Example: California's ballots would have been split between Clinton and Trump, not all assigned per statewide popular vote, where voter fraud in large urban areas swing states.

Dems in large urban areas could no longer wing states to the Dems by concentrating their efforts in these areas with the result of more people voting that eligible to vote, and false write in ballots.