Posted on 05/06/2018 9:06:19 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
How constitutional can this ban be? I realize that the Constitution is little more than buttwipe to liberals, but to pass a law forbidding people from choosing a certain therapy, or even speaking about it? There’s no way it will pass constitutional muster, so it’s nothing more than perversion-signalling of the lowest order.
Ok so sexual orientation is supposedly just set, and trying to change it needs to be banned...but changing ones actual sex is healthy and should be subsudised?
California serves as a reminder what the rest of the country would have been like if Hillary succeeded in stealing the election through her Russia collusion.
California accepts many things except the cure and truth.
“How California’s LGBT Therapy Ban Could Ban Christianity Itself”
Nobody could possibly believe that.
It won’t survive its first STATE court challenge.
Whether or not this bill makes it through, the goal for the people behind it is to eliminate religion, specifically Christianity. They will relentlessly continue that pursuit, through one of their phony “compassion” bills.
I’m wondering about this. Wouldn’t it cut both ways? Conversion therapy is outlawed because it seeks co change individual views on sexual orientation. Would not sex ed classes in school that highlights a gay lifestyle or sex be seen as trying to change an individual’s view on sex? I’m just sayin’.
How California’s LGBT Therapy Ban Could Ban Islam Itself
I’m rooting for the LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ Community.
Taken to its logical conclusion, we’ll eventually get back to Individualism (Thank you, Dr. Peterson.)
Someone needs to come up with a bill with the following language: “...This includes efforts to change behaviors or gender expressions, or to eliminate or reduce sexual or romantic attractions or feelings toward individuals of the OPPOSITE sex.”
What you said.
“...Could Ban Christianity Itself”
Remove “could” and you have it. That is precisely their intention! To eliminate the Bible, Christianity, and their influence on the laws of the country.
Strangely, they have no problem with the kooooran, and muzzism.
Anything that goes through insanity isn’t a road we need to be on.
The usual homoFascists are spewing their filth at the Federalist site comments section, but the regular readers are holding their own.
What I posted there, I’ll post here. To know what the homoFasicsts want to do, listen to what they assure us that they’d NEVER do.
bump
Pulse survivor, others gather to celebrate ‘freedom’ from being gay
Chandelis R. Duster
16 hrs ago
Nope. Exception to rule.
Bingo.
Heterosexual Monogamy: Horse.
Traditional Marriage: Cart.
Heterosexual monogamy is intrinsically natural: mono + gamete. A woman can choose to have sex with fifty men in an orgy. If she conceives a child, it will not have fifty fathers via fifty contributing sperm.
There is no such thing as homosexuality; it is homoeroticism. There is no functional sexuality between two members of the same sex.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.