Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There Is More to the Trade War than Trade
CSIS ^ | April 6, 2018 | James Andrew Lewis

Posted on 04/25/2018 2:29:09 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

There Is More to the Trade War than Trade

April 6, 2018

The clamor of timorous voices that have greeted the president’s “Trade War” with China makes one fear for the republic. Let’s do a quick recap:

China has extracted billions of dollars of intellectual property and confidential business information from U.S. companies. This has cost thousands of jobs and billions in lost revenue for the United States.

China imposes unfair restrictions on foreign companies that want to do business there, requiring them to become minority partners in joint ventures, transfer intellectual property, or in some instances, China blocks them from entry altogether. Chinese companies do not face similar constraints in the United States.

Contrary to its international commitments, China has used nontariff barriers and subsidies to build national champions and block foreign competition.

U.S. companies that want to do business in China have no alternative but to accept these restrictions. For many years this trade-off—access in exchange for intellectual property (IP)—seemed acceptable, and companies came up with various strategies to avoid loss. In the past few years, as China’s economy has matured, the cost of trading IP for access to China’s market has become unacceptable.

Since companies didn’t complain, the U.S. government did little or nothing in response to China’s policies. The 2015 Barack Obama–Xi Jinping agreement limiting commercial cyber espionage, while useful, does not address the main problem.

China is clear in what it wants, as it moves “closer than ever to the center of the global stage.” China is “more confident and able than ever to realize this goal,” which is to displace the United States in economic and technological leadership. China’s willingness to subsidize and restrict drives Western companies out of business.

(Excerpt) Read more at csis.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; economy; trade

1 posted on 04/25/2018 2:29:09 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Jeff Head; Tainan; hedgetrimmer; Unam Sanctam; taxesareforever; Avenger; ...

P!


2 posted on 04/25/2018 2:30:12 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Good article. And this is why we shouldn’t settle for China lowering it’s tariffs and barriers at this point. Because the damage has already done and leveling the playing field will not reverse the damage. In fact leveling the playing field will not stop the hemorrhaging of US jobs because China’s wages are so low.

We actually need to raise import tariffs and leave them raised until US industries are rebuilt.


3 posted on 04/25/2018 2:41:16 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Good article. And this is why we shouldn’t settle for China lowering it’s tariffs and barriers at this point. Because the damage has already done and leveling the playing field will not reverse the damage. In fact leveling the playing field will not stop the hemorrhaging of US jobs because China’s wages are so low.

We actually need to raise import tariffs and leave them raised until US industries are rebuilt.


4 posted on 04/25/2018 2:41:34 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China is an enemy and not a friend. We need a uniform 20% across the board tariff NOW!


5 posted on 04/25/2018 2:43:14 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
We actually need to raise import tariffs and leave them raised until US industries are rebuilt.

Tariffs are patriot candy.

6 posted on 04/25/2018 2:44:08 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The argument against tariffs on China that we so often hear, that it will only increase the cost of goods to American consumers, is true, but it is a bit like arguing that the police should just leave that creepy guy circling the school in his van alone because if they arrest him it will make it much more expensive for kids to acquire candy. China uses cheap labor as the bait to lure American companies into their trap.

There are far more important principles at stake in our relationship with China than the cost of consumer goods manufactured by them. My biggest worry for years now has been the grip that China has been acquiring over strategic materials and technologies that are crucial to our national defense. No short-sighted economic benefit is worth compromising our ability to defend ourselves in a confrontation, whether with China or someone else.

7 posted on 04/25/2018 3:04:29 AM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

bmp


8 posted on 04/25/2018 3:26:52 AM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

In before the free trade crowd!


9 posted on 04/25/2018 3:54:02 AM PDT by entropy12 (30 Million low wealth, low skill LEGAL chain migrants in 25 years is growing EXPONENTIALLY..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: noiseman
My biggest worry for years now has been the grip that China has been acquiring over strategic materials and technologies that are crucial to our national defense. No short-sighted economic benefit is worth compromising our ability to defend ourselves in a confrontation, whether with China or someone else.

100% agree.

10 posted on 04/25/2018 5:24:49 AM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

We should’ve nuked Stalin in 1946.


11 posted on 04/25/2018 8:40:06 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Okay, but Russia isn’t much of a trade problem. It’s China.

But if you’re saying by nuking Stalin in 1946, Mao wouldn’t have come to power in 1949, you might have a good point.

As soon as I finish my time machine, we’ll go fix that.


12 posted on 04/26/2018 8:28:14 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson