Demondogs are also at their best when they do not have to prove what the say.
In court you can’t just say things
The Dems need to be counter sued so damned hard their lawyers quit and get an honest job.
If that guy can’t grow anything but that pitiful pubic hair on his chin, he needs to just hang it up and shave.
On the lighter brighter side, Democrats might also discover another 200 people to blame for Hillary's loss...
All of the @ this and #that every other word not to mention the endless links there's almost no readable discernible text...
Some really pathetic garbled crap.
Discovery goes both ways. Would love to see what they have to say in their emails and conversations about their server hack.
Sherman said Democrats “like their party is focused on Russia almost maniacally to the detriment of every other issue that matters.”
Which is why I support their nonsense.
Hell I encourage it.
I know TDS is religion and dogma.
Karma is on the hunt
[ Politico Reporter: With DNC Lawsuit, Democrats Worry Their Party Is ‘Manically’ Obsessed With Russia ]
As they should be. This deliberate lie is so over-the-top even some liberals are walking away. You see them every now and then on Yahoo. They’ve had enough of the nonsense.
Seems like they are attempting to adapt their successful environmentalist tactics to politics in general, they tactic is to create a false issue such as an endangered species or water shortage and the file lawsuit after lawsuit to crush their opponent and get what they want
Distractions.... they need cover for Odungo
DemocRATS Overplaying a Bust Hand.
All the Democrats have is hysteria. This is needed to hold the base of lunatics together. They have nothing else.
You can’t have rational policy discussions when your party is mostly made up of takers and raving lunatics.
A sane liberal judge would do his party a favor by throwing this out as frivolous. But, that couldn’t be said in public, so to save face, they’d find a way to accomplish the same thing.
Trump was not heavyweight either [as] a candidate, but he spoke to the voters’ interests, spoke about jobs, visited their communities, and made himself as a cheerleader for the country; liberals are incapable of doing that because they’re obsessed in their campaign to tear down America. (My emphasis.)
Looks like the "but" phrase pretty well absorbs all that preceded it. There are still some fools on our side who still can't swallow our PRESIDENT Trump's greatness.
Here’s what the Democrats and their friends in the lugenpresse had to say about not accepting an election result, in October 2016:
A ‘HORRIFYING’ REPUDIATION OF DEMOCRACY — The Washington Post, Oct. 20, 2016
DENIAL OF DEMOCRACY — Daily News (New York), Oct. 20, 2016
DANGER TO DEMOCRACY — The Dallas Morning News, Oct. 20, 2016
ONE SCARY MOMENT; IT ALL BOILED DOWN TO ... DEMOCRACY — Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Oct. 21, 2016
“(Shock) spiked down the nation’s spinal column last night and today when the Republican nominee threatened that this little election thing you got there, this little democratic process you’ve got here, it’s nice, it’s fine, but he doesn’t necessarily plan on abiding by its decision when it comes to the presidency.” — Rachel Maddow, Oct. 20, 2016
“Trump’s answer on accepting the outcome of the vote is the most disgraceful statement by a presidential candidate in 160 years.” — Bret Stephens, then-deputy editorial page editor at The Wall Street Journal
“I guess we’re all going to have to wait until Nov. 9 to find out if we still have a country — if Donald Trump is in the mood for a peaceful transfer of power. Or if he’s going to wipe his fat a— with the Constitution.” — CBS’s Stephen Colbert, Oct. 19, 2016
“It’s unprecedented for a nominee of a major party to themselves signal that they would not accept — you know, respect the results of an election. We’ve never had that happen before. ... This really presents a potentially difficult problem for governing ...” — MSNBC’S Joy Reid, Oct. 22, 2016
“This is very dangerous stuff ... would seriously impair our functioning as a democracy. ... This is about as serious as it gets in the United States.” — CNN’s Peter Beinart, Oct. 20, 2016
“Obviously, it’s despicable for him to pretend that there’s any chance that he would not accept the results of this election; it would be — in 240 years you’ve never had anybody do it. ...” — CNN’s Van Jones, Oct. 20, 2016
“That’s horrifying. Let’s be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating — he is talking down our democracy. And I am appalled that someone who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that position.” – Hillary Clinton
““Every losing presidential candidate in modern times has accepted the will of the voters, even in extraordinarily close races, such as when John F. Kennedy narrowly defeated Richard M. Nixon in 1960 and George W. Bush beat Al Gore in Florida to win the presidency in 2000,” – New York Times