[rxsid]

"Typically misleading media interpretation. Gorsuch ruling mirrored Scalia's 2015 ruling in a similar case that ruled "crimes of violence" is unconstitutionally vague. If anything Gorsuch was upholding Scalia's brand of judicial conservatism and limiting government overreach. A good synopsis of what really happened and Gorsuch's legal reasoning can be found here.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2017/10/argument-analysis-faithful-scalia-gorsuch-may-deciding-vote-immigrant/

This bears repeating.

There is a remedy here....Congress.

They could make the law(s) less "vague."

Now, as long as we can hold the Congress after this fall, it can be done with enough pressure on them.

[dfwgator]

We went through this BS with Judas Roberts.

I don’t care what his reasoning was, the bottom line is he voted FOR ObamaCare.