Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lodi90

He joined parts of the opinion, and wrote his own opinion.

The media NEVER gets reporting on case law correct. Their one line headlines can never capture the nuances in a legal holding.

Morons who only care about “winning” or “losing” and who can’t read beyond the headlines and go to primary sources are the ones who “don’t care about an opinion.”

This issue goes beyond immigration. Gorsuch’s reasoning will also strike down the proposed ATF regulations on devices that allow semi-automatics to be fired “more quickly” than originally designed.

It’s based on an original understanding of giving notice to citizens of exactly what they are to be charged with.

There is room for reasoned disagreement on how far the void for vagueness doctrine extends, and Gorsuch directly addresses the difference of opinion that he has with Justice Thomas.

However, his approach is clearly tied to and based on an original understanding of the Constitution. Just like Justice Thomas’ opinion.

Kagan’s approach is different and its based on results.

Just like the people trashing Gorsuch because they are too dumb to read beyond the ASSPRESS headline.


23 posted on 04/17/2018 8:39:38 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGurl24
Well said!


24 posted on 04/17/2018 8:45:42 AM PDT by PROCON (Repeal the Gun-Free School Zone Act, Protect Our Children!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGurl24

This is about ILLEGAL INVADERS, not citizens.

While pointy-head academics debate the finer points in their ivory towers, the nation sinks.


27 posted on 04/17/2018 8:55:58 AM PDT by Kalamata (Meat hooks for Tyrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGurl24

Just like the people trashing Gorsuch because they are too dumb to read beyond the ASSPRESS headline.


I don’t care what the press writes.

I care that Gorsuch is voting with Dirtbag democrats on immigration issues while Americans lay dead in the streets of Democrat sanctuary cities.

Apparently, you haven’t noticed we are in a war here for the future of our country. Tip toeing through the tulips is not how you defeat rampaging Democrats.


34 posted on 04/17/2018 9:03:13 AM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGurl24
There is room for reasoned disagreement on how far the void for vagueness doctrine extends

It is not always possible to avoid some vagueness, because the number of hypothetical exceptions can seemingly approach infinity.

That is where the notion of "reasonable person" standard comes in.

That four reasonable justices interpreted our Constitution correctly argues against tossing around terms such as "moron" and "dumb".

42 posted on 04/17/2018 9:13:11 AM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGurl24
- bump -

It's hard work getting to the facts. Yes indeed, it is.

68 posted on 04/17/2018 10:28:08 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson