I visualize the situation as normal curves. Men & women have different normal curves but there is overlap and in the area of overlap the individual differences overwhelm any difference due to being male or female.
In the aggregate men are stronger for example but in that region where the normal curves of men & women overlap on strength a particular woman can be stronger than a particular man.
Human nature is defined by the lowest depths & highest reaches a human can achieve. The normal curves for the various attributes of human nature are different for men & women. In those many facets which make up human nature, some sets of curves overlap more than others. Yet in all cases there still is overlap ergo in the final analysis the deciding factor for human nature is the individual not the sex.
You’re not answering the question; you’re trying to redefine it which is similarly disingenuous.
Nevertheless, in keeping with your model, do you deny the possibility that spikes on the behavior curve for one sex may be vanishingly small blips on the curve for the other sex.
If so, why not.
I don’t know if you’ve realized it yet, but you’re in the unfortunate position of the proverbial young lady who accepted the old man’s offer of a million dollars to sleep with him, but rebuffed him when offered $50.