Not good at all.
Wrong answer.
Oh Nooooo! We are back to WW3!!!!!!!!!
Fake news unless and until demonstrated otherwise.
Sacrebleu !
Nooooo!
Fake news....
FU Macron.
let france take the lead and stay long term
These are the type of threads where the posters sound exactly like moonbat crazy leftists and liberals.
I mean exactly the same. Same hysteria and drama queen manner.
Etc...
Waiting for the official word.
Questions: do you want ISIS back in Syria?
Would Assad have held Syria if Trump hadn’t defeated ISIS?
i am not happy with ‘staying in Syria long term’ ... at least, not with large scale ground forces.
and...ESPECIALLY if we’re going to continue to IGNORE (protect? enable?) the largest and most dangerous Muslim terrorist murder gang in Syria and Lebanon (Hezballah), this gang supplies many/most of the forces that are killing people there.. and it represents the greatest threat to world peace due to its Satanic blood-thirst, extremely active deployments in numerous locations in Lebanon and Syria, and of course its constant threats to murder more and more innocent people... and Hezballah appears to be constantly stirring up conflicts, fights, battles in Syria..between other groups, forces, armies. As long as we are in there, we should definitely eliminate (not just attack or injure) Hezballah (AND THIS CAN LARGELY BE ACHIEVED WITH A FEW DAY’S SERIOUS AERIAL BOMBARDMENT... we do NOT need to use large ground forces to win THIS one...I have never understood and still don’t understand the large ground commitments when we have such a wonderful USAF... take out what’s left of the Syrian air force and any S-300 or similar missiles that might have gotten snuck into Syria or Lebanon .. take out Hezballah and its reported 150,000 smaller rocket bombs (they’re reportedly mostly stored up all in a small area, should be fairly easy to just incinerate, melt that that area, annihilate it from the air)...I do not see why we would need any large ground presence for any extended period of time. Effective maintenance of any areas we clear of enemy forces can then be achieved from the air and with very minimal manning on the ground for intelligence or perimeter monitoring purposes. Why send in long-term large scale forces if, as I believe, they’re not necessary? Perhaps the generals know better but if large scale long term ground forces are needed anywhere in these shitcan countries...I’d sure appreciate the generals to explain it...so at least we can understand
Unlike you NeverTrumpers some of us wait to see what Trump has to say and do. Some of us are just getting over the N Korea nuclear war.
Whatever the French want, do the opposite.
Because France did us such a big favor handing off Viet Nam to us?
Macron is a fool. There is absolutely zero public support for that, among the American public.
We've had quite enough of losing our precious blood and treasure in islamic hellholes.
No thanks!
Oh great. Another excuse for the next Obama to leave Syria after giving billions in sorry money to Iran
Need verification.
It’s a sad day when we allow the frogs to convince us of anything.