Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge keeps hold on Trump transgender troop ban
The Hill ^ | 04/14/18 | Jacqueline Thomsen

Posted on 04/14/2018 5:11:39 PM PDT by Simon Green

A federal judge ruled late Friday that the injunctions put in place to halt President Trump’s ban on transgender members of the military should remain in place.

U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman of the Western District of Washington blocked the federal government from imposing the ban, ruling that transgender people are a protected class of people, according to HuffPost.

“The Court also rules that, because transgender people have long been subjected to systemic oppression and forced to live in silence, they are a protected class. Therefore, any attempt to exclude them from military service will be looked at with the highest level of care, and will be subject to the Court’s ‘strict scrutiny,’ ” Pechman wrote.

The judge, an appointee of former President Clinton, wrote that the government would have to show the ban was “sincerely motivated by compelling interests, rather than by prejudice or stereotype.”

She also noted that the federal government had failed in its case “to identify even one General or military expert [Trump] consulted, despite having been ordered to do so repeatedly.”

The ruling is the latest court order to halt the ban on transgender troops.

Trump moved forward last month with his plan to ban most transgender people from serving in the military.

The White House released a memorandum at the time outlining policies set by Defense Secretary James Mattis. The memo stated that transgender people are "disqualified from military service except under limited circumstances."

The president initially announced such a ban on Twitter last summer, but the policy has faced several legal challenges in the months since.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; lawsuit; trumpdod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2018 5:11:39 PM PDT by Simon Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Why does everybody get to be the president except the president?


2 posted on 04/14/2018 5:14:13 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Please, please, please divide up the country. Let these people have their own nation with a tranny military, abortion on every streetcorner, or any other form of perversion they want. BUT NOT HERE.


3 posted on 04/14/2018 5:15:00 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Sorry but she is out of line, is not thew CIC and has no authority here. Will be tossed out and her too.


4 posted on 04/14/2018 5:18:36 PM PDT by DarthVader ("The biggeest misconception on Free Republic is that the Deep State is invulnerable")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
These ‘Federal Judges’ are like demi-gods. They operate outside the Law and Constitution. They can do whatever they want. The other 2 branches need to rein them in - if the Nation is to survive (since the Judicial branch is apparently stacked with a bunch of leftist activists).
5 posted on 04/14/2018 5:20:15 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Can a federal judge rescind every order of the C in C? If so, we are in deep doodoo. If not, then she should be ignored.


6 posted on 04/14/2018 5:20:23 PM PDT by raybbr (That progressive bumper sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
Criminalizing Trump's authority once again..

BTW, ask this b*tch of a judge if humans are a protected class. Then ask her "Why are taxpayers FORCED to subsidize ABORTION via Planned Parenthood?"

TRUMP NEEDS TO START IGNORING THESE ACTIVIST JUDGES' RULINGS WHERE THEY ARE CLEARLY USURPING HIS AUTHORITY AS COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF.

7 posted on 04/14/2018 5:23:54 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
She also noted that the federal government had failed in its case “to identify even one General or military expert [Trump] consulted, despite having been ordered to do so repeatedly.”

This decision by this Clinton-appointed court may offer two reasons for why Trump has not yet brought criminal actions v Comey, Mueller, etc.

The fed court system may actually be a larger part of the swamp than we suspect and some, or even too many federal prosecutors may be inclined to quietly work at cross-purposes with this President.

8 posted on 04/14/2018 5:27:31 PM PDT by frog in a pot (The obscene "Remaking of America" boldly continues to grow and overflow in California.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

When is someone going to say that it’s unconstitutional for judges to do this?


9 posted on 04/14/2018 5:27:38 PM PDT by wastedyears (Americans are dreamers too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Trump should just say it’s a national security issue and ignore her.
And it does affect national security, having mentally ill troops and spending unlimited dollars on their “transition”, while they can’t serve.


10 posted on 04/14/2018 5:28:47 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

As a “protected class” they should be “protected” in insane asylums around the country, The military should be for normal, not gender-bent cases. That jurist belongs in there with them.


11 posted on 04/14/2018 5:34:28 PM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Only in the US can crossdressing men be gay fem soldiers


12 posted on 04/14/2018 5:34:41 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Another judge claiming the powers of the military and presidency for herself.

This policy allowing them in never before existed prior 2015 - now people act like going back to the policy of 1776 - 2015 is suddenly something unheard of. Ridiculous.


13 posted on 04/14/2018 5:38:56 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

“Please, please, please divide up the country. Let these people have their own nation with a tranny military, abortion on every streetcorner, or any other form of perversion they want. BUT NOT HERE.”

California?


14 posted on 04/14/2018 5:39:01 PM PDT by snoringbear (W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

There is no ban. They can serve if they meet very turgid and unbendable rules. They’re not going to make it.


15 posted on 04/14/2018 5:40:31 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

When is someone going to say that it’s unconstitutional for there to be a “protected class” of people?


16 posted on 04/14/2018 5:41:50 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy
Only in the US can crossdressing men be gay fem soldiers

Actually, they now do so in virtually every country in Euroope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_people_and_military_service#Status_of_transgender_people_in_the_military_by_country

17 posted on 04/14/2018 5:42:01 PM PDT by Simon Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

so the idiots who change their gender like changing socks are protected. From who? They’re the nut jobs. Seems like WE should be protected from THEM.


18 posted on 04/14/2018 5:44:35 PM PDT by fivecatsandadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

.
“Federal Judges” have zero executive authority.

No one has an unconditional right to enlist in the military.

They can reject anyone they wish, and don’t have to tell you why.
.


19 posted on 04/14/2018 5:44:41 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

You really wonder what these judges were taught in law school.


20 posted on 04/14/2018 5:51:21 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson