To: Cronos
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. If they were humans, there was war.
6 posted on
04/10/2018 4:03:51 AM PDT by
RoosterRedux
(Churchill: Success is not final, failure is not fatal. It is the courage to continue that counts.)
To: RoosterRedux
Actually you can't conclude that - you can conclude that there may or may not have been war but based on the evidence available it seems that there was no war. War leaves tell-tale evidence of destruction, but there is none. It seems a very reasonable theory (unless proved wrong) that they didn't need to go to war.
As there were no invading outsiders it seems one reason, but also they didn't fight amongst themselves which is strange.
14 posted on
04/10/2018 4:32:34 AM PDT by
Cronos
(Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
To: RoosterRedux
TL;DR high level analysis:
If you don't wage war, you'll get indoor plumbing.
20 posted on
04/10/2018 5:19:02 AM PDT by
T-Bone Texan
(Idiocracy is here, and it votes democrat.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson