Posted on 04/09/2018 7:34:23 AM PDT by bitt
Ad hominem.
Logical fallacy.
You lise.
That is not a documented or reliable source. You are merely repeating a baseless smear. Link to some actual evidence, or admit you’re just a gossipmonger.
Btw, I was reading The Conservative Treehouse 4 years ago. Sundance was solid conservative—and a GREAT analyst.
Is unhinged Mark Bradman, who blogs under the fake name “Sundance,” a closet Marxist?
MARK LEVIN·SATURDAY, MARCH 25, 2017
The disgruntled former grocery clerk is lashing out with his usual leftist, class-warfare, conspiracy propaganda in defense of the big-government, Obamacare-lite, RINOCARE bill defeated by principled constitutional conservatives. The more we learn about Bradman and his “Conservative Treehouse” site, the more you wonder what this kook is up to.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/03/25/healthcare-controls-and-the-benefits-of-the-blame-game/
lise = lose
Did you even read the article you linked to? It’s great—and 100% conservative.
Look, I am massively disappointed that Sundance thinks Rosenstein is a white hat. But I don’t hate him as you appear to, and I would never post slanders about him. You are hurting your case hugely.
__________________
You don't have to worry about that.
I would not call someone a great analyst if they are consistently wrong.
What besides the Mueller/Rosenstein/Sessions cabal has Sundance been wrong about?
I dont feel the need to prove my case. Mr bradmans history of overreach, inaccurate and plainly wrong analysis of documents, wishful thinking predictions and overall lack of credibility speak for themselves. One area I will credit him for putting an an analysis together that makes it easy for others to understand is his description of the uniparty, economics ties to the uniparty and the role of the US Chamber of commerce in bribing congress for anti american purposes. THAT explanation is helpful without needing to rely on suppositions, speculation and fantasy.
A list of undocumented accusations is useless. If you can’t give examples then you have zero evidence to back your claim.
I don’t believe you’re familiar with Sundance at all. Your lone positive credit omits at least two of his huge, massive successes.
I dont have the time to list every daily BIG UGLY that he predicts that never comes about, especially since he never comments on his predictions that are wrong and disppear into the ether ( sounds just like the comments I sent you from another sundance critic). Are we the only people who actually read and listen to this guy and then know when stuff he says doesnt come to pass? I guess other CTH folks merely repeat his musings and never bother to follow up.
Which two?
I believe there is an organized anti-Sundance smear campaign underway. You have yet to list anything beyond the Mueller issue, which I already admitted. Your baseless accusations are getting on my last nerve.
Their is NO organized anti cult activity. It is just that many folks recognize what you apparently refuse to do.
If you had a clue, you would know. It’s a testament to your ignorance that you have no idea. I have seen even Sundance *haters* give him credit for the two instances of deep, protracted analysis to which I am alluding. How can you run around smearing Sundance while knowing next to nothing about him, and then look yourself in the mirror?
1
Wrong. The smears are being spread aggressively. It’s a disgrace.
I have seen some cultists say that bradmans prediction that the Trump economy would take off is a CTH success story. Personally, most of us Trumps supporters predicted thatthe day he announced so Im not sure how much of a credible prediction is that one.
A swing and a miss. Anything Sundance said re Trump’s economy is not one of the two issues to which I alluded.
Really? Ive seen a few comments comparing Q to CTH in a satirical way and a few posters criticize crazy bradman.I would hardly call it aggressive or organized or an epidemic of criticism.
He did predict Bannon would end up being fired.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.