Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mueller has evidence that Trump supporter's meeting with Putin ally may not have been a chance (tr)
ABC News ^ | 6 April 2018 | Pierre Thomas & James Gordon Meek

Posted on 04/06/2018 6:36:23 AM PDT by Magnatron

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Magnatron

Nothing about COLLUSION. This is just a perjury trap he might have jumped in to.


21 posted on 04/06/2018 6:53:36 AM PDT by Paradox (Don't call them mainstream, there is nothing mainstream about the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Wait, this was after he was elected, right? Who cares then?


22 posted on 04/06/2018 6:57:03 AM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
Hehehe...good one.

How about the fact that George Nader and Bill Clinton are pool buddies as seen in this article? More of the Clinton crowd getting immunity?

https://truepundit.com/busted-muellers-new-star-witness-trump-caught-partying-exclusive-island-resort-bill-clinton/

23 posted on 04/06/2018 6:58:54 AM PDT by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

The meeting Nader was reportedly either witness too, or helped arrange, was after the election during the transition period. The meeting in question was with Eric prince and a reported close associate of Putin. The “investigative” question comes from the report/claim that Prince said the meeting was happenstance, and now Mueller’s team is taking the position it was not happenstance; that it was prearranged.

And again the importance of the meeting that all the innuendo is trying to leave out is that it occurred during the transition, after the election was over. Every White house in the U.S. after the election and in it’s transition phase has attempted to begin charting its own foreign policy course and that included making contact with important foreign officials. The importance is not merely a matter of “friendly”, just important to U.S. foreign policy.

So, over a meeting that took place just days before Trump took office, the entire mainstream media is salivating on what to them are the “key words” - Trump associate, & Russian. They are attempting to salivate before the public back and forth intently of that limited set of information, helping the public to ignore, IT HAPPENED AFTER THE ELECTION WAS OVER AND DURING THE TRANSITION PHASE OF THE NEW ADMINISTRATION.

“Collusion”, definitely not.

So what is Mueller doing with this? He’s playing “gotcha” with Eric prince, to snare ERIC PRINCE on a perjury charge over a matter that happened AFTER the election.

The media is salivating massively over this in front of the public, making believe that “now we got him” (meaning Trump) when all Mueller has is a possible perjury wrap on Eric Prince.


24 posted on 04/06/2018 6:58:55 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

“may not have been “

This is the best Mulehead has?


25 posted on 04/06/2018 6:59:34 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

I am scared Trump supporter. I talk to Russians on Ham Radio regularly.


26 posted on 04/06/2018 7:02:33 AM PDT by DEPcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

So let’s see if I understand this... a meeting, chance or not between a Trump supporter and some Russkie that happened AFTER the election somehow proves pre-election collusion between Trump and Putin? Is this really what passes for logic at the OIC? If so, Mueller needs a head CT, stat!


27 posted on 04/06/2018 7:02:35 AM PDT by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Whatever happened to the investigation into Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group’s ties to the Russians?


28 posted on 04/06/2018 7:04:16 AM PDT by Mr. N. Wolfe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

So what was my first thought also.


29 posted on 04/06/2018 7:05:50 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

This is more BS as Trump had already been elected.


30 posted on 04/06/2018 7:06:38 AM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

I have evidence Mueller should be sent feet first through a wood chipper.


31 posted on 04/06/2018 7:07:33 AM PDT by Eddie01 (I learned it on FreeRepublic.com, same as you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TallahasseeConservative
And what constitutes a supporter? Donation? Attending a rally? Voting for him? 

Not being on record saying mean snarky things about him makes one a "Trump supporter."

-PJ

32 posted on 04/06/2018 7:07:37 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

The Seychelles meeting was Jan. 11, 2017. Trump had already been elected. So I couldn’t imagine this goes a long way of proving any collusion with the Russians.

Trump didn’t need back channels after being elected. Plenty of people were coming to him and he was going to be in the office soon enough.


33 posted on 04/06/2018 7:14:57 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Zzz zzz.

ABC is fake news.


34 posted on 04/06/2018 7:21:32 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron
I am a "Trump Supporter." I have a MAGA hat. I've been to Trump rallies in Pittsburgh and Youngstown.

I travelled to Russia in 1993 looking to establish business opportunities. Went to Omsk, Moscow and St Pete. Nothing panned out.

So f*** you, Mueller, are you going to subpoena me too?

35 posted on 04/06/2018 7:24:29 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Democrats: the political party of the undead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. N. Wolfe

“Whatever happened to the investigation into Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group’s ties to the Russians?”

See, that had nothing to do with Trump and was before the election so it is of no concern to this asshat.


36 posted on 04/06/2018 7:24:58 AM PDT by Mouton (The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

Man ... I’m getting scared ... I had Russian dressing on my salad last night. When does Mulehead subpoena me ?


37 posted on 04/06/2018 7:27:51 AM PDT by clamper1797 (We are getting close to the last "box")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

It has been said that Mueller is talking to Russian oligarchs as witnesses against Trump & his team. Loretta Lynch lets a Russian lawyer into the country on a special VISA, & this lawyer met with numerous members of the press & with politicians, but her 15 minute meeting with Trump son gave Obama’s people reason to spy on Trump with FISA warrants. Carter Page talked to Russians, & therefore, he had to be spied on as a national security threat. But Hillary used Russian sources, Bill Clinton took $500K to make speeches in Moscow, the Clinton foundation to multi-millions in Russian loot......but that is not considered reason to get FISA warrants against Loretta Lynch or the Clintons.
When Mueller uses Russians & convicted liars as witnesses against Trump....ie squeezes convicted liars to testify against Trump for some “October surprise” meant to swing the election to Democrats so they may impeach Trump......it won’t matter if there’s nothing that will convict Trump......but Mueller will have succeeded politically & the press will have no problem with anybody talking to Russians except Trump.....to the point where the press even will support using Russians as witnesses with convicted liars & others who have been tortured and bankrupted by the Mueller inquisition.


38 posted on 04/06/2018 7:29:09 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
"ABC is fake news."

It most certainly is.

If this Mulehead Circus doesn't put the kebosh on any future president ever allowing a special counsel to be formed it would surprise me. This shifty jerk has twisted and turned his investigation is many knots it is amazing. But I guess you would expect that considering his pre-planned use as the "insurance policy" that is trying desperately to fulfill it's mission of unseating a duly elected president?

39 posted on 04/06/2018 7:31:26 AM PDT by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Magnatron

BLAH BLAH ,ya ya , and Obama’s open mic telling the Russian he’ll be more flexible is nothing


40 posted on 04/06/2018 7:32:07 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson