97% of the 75 surveys selected from a response of 7000 returned forms.
Not cherry-picking at all, noooo.
“American Conservatives Still Refuse to Accept Global Warming BS”
So only Republicans and independents have heard of the Bandwagon fallacy?
Notice how they just flippantly throw out “90% expert agreement” and just move on.
Dana, you are the one who doesnt realize how the percentage was determined.
Those media outlets are what are saving us from your idiocy.
It is not that I don’t “realize” humans are causing global warming.
I do realize that “climate scientists” are a bunch of dirt-bag grant whores who lie to get money—and the media “reporters” are terrified to report anything outside of the Overton Window.
“....8590% of Democrats are worried about global warming, realize humans are causing it, and are aware that most scientists agree on this,....” So, just because they have managed to pull the wool over the eyes of dems, we should capitulate and cave in? Nah.
While 8590% of Democrats are worried about global warming, realize humans are causing it, and are aware that most scientists agree on this, independents and Republicans are a different story.
Mars is warming. Jupiter is warming. The moons of Saturn are warming. Pluto is warming.
We need to take this seriously! The entire solar system is at stake here!!
1. What cause the earth to warm, and ice to retreat which ended previous ice ages?
2. Why isn’t that mentioned, ever? And how the present warming differs from that?
All mankind combined is a mere speck of dust, a grain of sand, compared to the sun and the universe. That we control "global warming" is the height of arrogance and the result of feeble men who believe they are godlike.
Let’s start by noting that 97% of the ‘experts’ in this so-called consensus are no such thing.
There is no such concept in science as “scientific consensus.”
Anyone who uses the term invalidates their thesis.
With the “greening” of first world industry, how is it possible that our climate is in worse shape, than it was during the industrial revolution?
Only conservatives are smart enough to realize that man made global warming is a total hoax concocted to redistribute money. In most cases, our money.
Is CO2 a greenhouse gas? Yes, almost universal agreement
Is CO2 the most notable greenhouse gas? No, water vapor is #1
Is CO2 a trace gas? Yes, 0.04% of atmosphere
Has CO2 been at higher levels in the past? Yes, while before the industrial revolution.
At prior higher levels, did the earth experience catastrophic “runaway warming”? No.
Is the earth coming out of a little ice age? Yes, so cherry picking data from 1900+ A.D. is not an accurate historical perspective.
Is NOAH “adjusting” data to make past years cooler and more recent years hotter? Yes, they no longer provide the raw data. The “adjustments” are for theoretical reasons.
Do plants benefit from CO2? Yes, it is needed for them to exist and more of it means more plant life.
Is CO2 a heavy gas? Yes, it hugs the ground, where plants live and is less abundant higher up in the atmosphere.
So I’m supposed to believe a trace gas, that is necessary for plant life, that provides an equilibrium to the climate, that has had higher levels in the past, will become catastrophic if it increases a little more due to human activity? It’s also not surprising that all of the solutions to this problem happen to be political and aligned with progressives.
I love how these folks believe that we’re ignorant because of Fox News and things the President tweets. It says more about their view on how media controls minds than anything. They don’t understand how there can be resistance as they have a common narrative.
In addition, the 97% number is false. This only true when asking scientists if they believe CO2 is a greenhouse gas. When you ask if any warming is due to human production of CO2 then you get a very different number.
Note the wording. "realize that humans are causing it" as if there is no doubt.
So what is the median temperature of the earth? Next question why is there not only one computer model for climate prediction if there is consensus among these experts?