The Dems have won the popular vote in 6 out of the last 7 elections. If current legal immigration levels continue, they will be the permanent majority party within a decade.
Posted on 03/20/2018 4:00:04 PM PDT by Altura Ct.
Happened in the German section of Lancaster, PA quickly. The neighborhood the Leiderkranz was in became so unsafe they moved out of the city. This was about 25 years ago.
Oh, and their brats are never subject to quotas or “diversity” in admissions or employment.
You people keep sitting on your asses and voting for it.
Just 16 years later, Hazleton is majority Hispanic.
Thank God for Tucker saying this.
Another poster said:
“The important demographic is WASP citizens not having enough kids to maintain a population”
That’s because in the early ‘70s we were told we were “overpopulated” and should have only “replacement children”.
Couple that with Abortion being legalized at the same time - and population control was used as a reason in that decision - and the American population simply did not reproduce itself.
The number of “hispanics” here - about 60 million - is roughly equal to the number of children aborted between 1973 and now.
The economy pulled them in to fill the vacuum left by the never born.
There are other reasons but that’s the major mechanical reason.
No Nation that stayed a nation has ever done this to itself. And certainly not what was the most successful nation on Earth. Until now.
“...German section of Lancaster...”
Also the German section of Philly is now a dangerous ghetto area.
“Our leaders are for diversity, just not where they live.”
Agreed, BUT QUIT CALLING THEM LEADERS!!! Those asshats are “representatives” at best.
The neighborhood where the political elites live are the least “diverse” of all and have more of the top “1%” as well.
What they have done is treasonous and said: “Change is good for thee and not me”.
Our “elites” are the biggest NIMBY people there are.
So does this mean illegal is ‘bad’ ?
I sorry, this hole thin is so confusinn
Yep, my high school was overwhelmingly black when I was there in the 80’s. Now it’s overwhelmingly Hispanic. The black vs. Hispanic tension is still one of the most under-reported stories over the last 25 years.
Donald Trump got elected as a republican by running hard against the Mexicans.
And not just illegal Mexicans, Trump is planning on cutting the quota of legal Mexicans in half.
What dumba$$es our political rulers are to not think this will not affect their children and grandchildren and ...
The Dems have won the popular vote in 6 out of the last 7 elections. If current legal immigration levels continue, they will be the permanent majority party within a decade.
The public debate is that Democrats are doing their best to prevent ANY debate. It isn’t that all in the DNC are for population replacement but that they want a population that will given them power and not oppose them. Ever.
They do this in line with the racism they endorse: less Christian and less white. They actively support less straight and less posterity from Citizens too, which adds a function of their open borders stance because as big government nasties they are more willing to risk Islamic invasion / migration than face ever reducing their power or prestige (this is foolish, because Muslims tend to not share power once it becomes an option for them).
The RNC is full of cowards trying desperately to get along with folks they should be defeating or else labor under notions of big tents ... so they sadly tend to resist their base or rational folks among them starting any debates.
The 14th was written in such a way as to exclude the children of those not properly under our civil Jurisdiction from even be considered citizens no matter where they were born. There should have never been anchor babies.
I'll start by making a random statement as food for thought and discussion : What would be the reaction, both domestically and foreign, if we were to pass a law, forbidding legal immigrants (seeking permanent residence) from learning English.
Expecting a rational answer, I will postpone posting anything further or commenting on the irrelevant red herring of --- but are they 'nice?'
And you can expect them to expand geometrically, so long as the distorted natural born citizen definition continues to be distorted, unconstitutionally.
Second, the decline in work among the native-born over the last 14 years of high immigration is consistent with research showing that immigration reduces employment for natives.
Third, the trends since 2000 challenge the argument that immigration on balance increases job opportunities for natives. Over 17 million immigrants arrived in the country in the last 14 years, yet native employment has deteriorated significantly.
Since 1990 over 35 million LEGAL PERMANENT IMMIGRANTS have entered this country, which is equivalent to the current population of Canada. We have just had three of the four highest decades of legal immigration in our history. In 1970 one in 21 was foreign-born; today, it is a llittle less than one in 8, the highest in 105 years; and by 2023 it will be one in seven, the highest in our history.
Seniors are not the problem. We don't need to import 1.1 million legal permanent immigrants every year, which doesn't count the 300,000 anchor babies born to illegal aliens every year. Immigrants and their US born children drive 80% of our annual population growth.
Civilian Labor Participation rates 16 and up:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.