Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaxtonBrown
"As an engineer we were taught to use a 2.5 safety factor."

As an engineer in training I was taught that in civil engineering (bridges and such), the factor was 5. Early sixties.

234 posted on 03/15/2018 12:50:29 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Donald J. Trump- El Presidente Por La Vida!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: matthew fuller; DaxtonBrown
It's a bit more complicated than that. There are different safety factors for dead load (the weight of the structure itself), live loads (the occupants), and environmental loads (wind, snow, earthquakes, etc.). And these safety factors vary for buildings and bridges, too.

Very few applications in civil engineering would use a safety factor of 5. In fact, structures tend to have lower safety factors than many other applications like mechanical systems, aircraft, etc. because the loads tend to be very predictable.

329 posted on 03/15/2018 1:26:17 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

To: matthew fuller
As an engineer in training I was taught that in civil engineering (bridges and such), the factor was 5. Early sixties.

Back around that same time my Dad, an engineer and an architect, told me the same thing. On bridges and such they always designed in a safety factor of five.

484 posted on 03/15/2018 4:25:44 PM PDT by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson