Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity - NY Times has Saccone winning by 62% & then scraps prediction, suddenly....Election fraud?

Posted on 03/14/2018 2:49:46 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX

Last evening I began watching the PA-18th-CD election returns on the New York Times newspaper election results site...which is by far the best in the business for election reporting and background information.

As the initial election returns flowed in, the Times indicated that, though the race was very close, it appeared like Conon Lamb would eke out a victory scoring 52%-48% over Rick Saccone.

Then about fifteen minutes later, the Times suddenly changed its prediction to Saccone winning by a 62%-38% over Lamb. The Times said that they had information as to voting patterns in the Conservative counties, indicating a Saccone victory. I was stunned out of my senses....this lasted for few minutes...when suddenly the Times killed all of its prediction outlines, saying that they did not have enough accurate information to predict results, either way.

I immediately smelled a rotten fish, that someone had gotten to the Times folks and told them cut that stuff out.....Lamb is going to win. Of course election tampering came into my mind immediately.

If I were the GOP/RNC & the Saccone folks...I would "hard line" follow-up on this "weird" series of events with the New York Times...which "Never" makes this kind of error on election reporting...Strange?. It smells like voter fraud might have been alive and well in the Conor Lamb camp last evening. Just a thought...folks!!!


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: 18thdistrict; conorlamb; election; electionfraud; lamb; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; nytimes; pa2018; paspecialelection; pennsylvania; ricksaccone; saccone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: JLAGRAYFOX

I flipped between NYTIMES and the PA SOS site.
After awhile they stopped their future projections.
However, their counts were always just a tad ahead of the PA SOS numbers and were not off.


21 posted on 03/14/2018 4:06:32 PM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Yes, many dems (with a conscience) admittedly know there was election fraud in this large voting bloc that suddenly came in. Absentee ballots MUST to be investigated thoroughly.... cross checked....and eventually banned. Too much fraud by Dems.


22 posted on 03/14/2018 4:48:02 PM PDT by LOVETRUMP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

THE “LAMB” ABSENTEE. BALLOTS. DO. LIE.

HAVE WE NOT LEARNED ANYTHING FROM ALABAMA.


23 posted on 03/14/2018 4:50:44 PM PDT by LOVETRUMP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX
.
Every special election is controlled by fraud.
.
24 posted on 03/14/2018 5:04:53 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson