Posted on 03/14/2018 1:12:48 PM PDT by detective
The White House’s suspicions over the motives of besieged FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe go back at least to the first months of President Trump’s presidency.
The doubts revolved around a since-debunked February 2017 New York Times story that reported that U.S. intelligence owned numerous intercepts and phone records of Trump campaign officials communicating with Russian intelligence.
As recounted in his new book, “Media Madness,” Fox News reporter Howard Kurtz wrote that then-Chief of Staff Reince Priebus was conducting an intelligence meeting when Mr. McCabe called him aside.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Hopefully, he will be fired ad then prosecuted.
His shilling for Hillary didn’t raise any eyebrows?
How can a story be DISCREDITED as “debunked” four times in the title and leading sentences, when the Trump campaign WAS being wiretapped by the Obama FBI and NSA and CIA and ...
It’s not the wiretapping that was debunked but the “communicating with Russian intelligence” that was debunked.
Indeed, the phrasing is not clear. Reader can’t tell for sure what is “debunked”
1) the story about intercepts and phone records of Trump’s officials
2) the story about the intercepts and phone records of Trump’s officials communicating with Russians.
We know that 1) is NOT debunked, quite the contrary because the FISA applications.
We also know that 2) is debunked because after more than years of investigation, Mueller and dems have nothing to show for.
NYT won an award on BS about Trump-Russia
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.