Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SpeedyInTexas

One reason the 5th likely ruled that our law would hold up in Federal is because existing federal laws and regs already back it. To be frank (or even John), any entity that takes federal funds has a legal obligation to follow federal regulations/laws. The grantor/lendor (federal government) has a legal obligation (meaning the agencies have to do it) to ensure that the grantee/lendee is abiding by those regs, or cut the funds.

This is why Jerry Brown is playing a snake game in Cali.

By the way, I’m still waiting for those bellweather wins again George P and Sid that he media claimed would happen last week. Suck it, media!


46 posted on 03/13/2018 10:19:00 PM PDT by Proudarmybrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Proudarmybrat

Agreed. This case will reinforce
former favorable filings. California
will be throwing a tantrum. They will
undoubtedly pass laws that will require
future challenges. Unbelievable that
they support these vermin. Afterall,
it’s still just a misdemeanor offense
to sh*t on the sidewalk in San Francisco.
Never mind indecent exposure, where in some states, will land you on a sex offenders list.


54 posted on 03/13/2018 11:24:42 PM PDT by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson