Skip to comments.
National Geographic acknowledges decades-long coverage was racist
The Telegraph ^
| March 13, 2018
| Mark Molloy
Posted on 03/13/2018 8:56:01 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
ROTFLOL
To: Navy Patriot
So, I guess they’ll recall all those issues with bare breasted native women?..................
2
posted on
03/13/2018 8:57:48 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
To: Navy Patriot
They want to call themselves racist? Have at it.
It is their idiot embrace of man-caused Global Warming that made me vow never to pick up their magazine again, even if I am stuck in a dentist office waiting for a root canal.
3
posted on
03/13/2018 8:59:05 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(No tagline available right now. Come back later.)
To: Red Badger
I guess theyll recall all those issues with bare breasted native women?...From my cold dead hand ...
4
posted on
03/13/2018 9:00:32 AM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(America returns to the Rule of Law)
To: Navy Patriot
The US magazine acknowledged in an editorial that for decades its coverage was racist, adding that the only way to rise above its past was to acknowledge it.
and accuse their readers of being racists for having read their magazine.
5
posted on
03/13/2018 9:01:13 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: Red Badger
“So, I guess theyll recall all those issues with bare breasted native women?..................”
Too late for that.
The only fair thing to do now is to publish pictures of bare-breasted white women, until the numbers of such photos equals the past number of bare-breasted non-white women.
6
posted on
03/13/2018 9:01:44 AM PDT
by
oldbill
To: Navy Patriot
No more naked African chicks? I remember that as a kid.
It’s kinda comical how so many today want to deny how the world works and thinks they can ignore human nature. Good luck with that.
7
posted on
03/13/2018 9:02:18 AM PDT
by
robroys woman
(So you're not confused, I'm male.)
To: rlmorel
It is their idiot embrace of man-caused Global Warming that made me vow never to pick up their magazine again, That, and the unbelievable stench that their Earth-saving-greenie-weenie ink gave off when the magazine arrived. We banned them from our house in the early 2000s for that reason alone. Couldn't pick it up to read it for a month until the smell dissipated.
8
posted on
03/13/2018 9:02:52 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
To: Red Badger
I recall those bare breasted native women very well. Most beautiful were Balinese & Polynesian gals.
;^)
9
posted on
03/13/2018 9:03:38 AM PDT
by
elcid1970
("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
To: robroys woman
Don’t go bashing on them nekkd natives. As a yute that’s all we had. Of course the Sears catlaog, too.
To: robroys woman
NG covered sh*thole countries before sh*thole countries were cool.
To: oldbill
The main difference between Nat Geo and Playboy is that brown breasts are less sinful than white ones.
;^)
12
posted on
03/13/2018 9:06:23 AM PDT
by
elcid1970
("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
To: Navy Patriot
This is a smart move on the part of NG:
It’ll give them an excuse to devote more coverage to Global Warming.
13
posted on
03/13/2018 9:08:06 AM PDT
by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: MeganC
If it gets hot, hot, hot as NG fervently believes, won’t that necessitate more bare breasted wimmen (especially those at whiter northen latitudes)?
To: robroys woman
Taught a lot of us the importance of a bra.
To: Red Badger
Naked white women=pornography
Naked black women=anthropology.
16
posted on
03/13/2018 9:18:16 AM PDT
by
bk1000
(I stand with Trump)
To: ilovesarah2012
Taught a lot of us the importance of a bra.
HA! I forgot about that!
And you’re right. :)
17
posted on
03/13/2018 9:25:55 AM PDT
by
robroys woman
(So you're not confused, I'm male.)
To: Navy Patriot
LOL This ought to be good. What specifically are they saying was racist?
- Topless tribal women were overwhelming of color?
- No white tribal news coverage?
- Coverage of tribes unbalanced with coverage of modern man?
- Something to do with fossils?
- Out of Africa coverage?
- There are so many possibilities.....
18
posted on
03/13/2018 9:27:40 AM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: Navy Patriot
National Geographic has committed the sin of showing the earth as it is.
19
posted on
03/13/2018 9:30:02 AM PDT
by
JimSEA
To: elcid1970
They had topless Polynesian girls??
20
posted on
03/13/2018 9:37:00 AM PDT
by
MNDude
(RED CROSS RED RED. NK. Hussein. ASIA. Why was that STRINGER sent out? Decode. News unlocks message.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson