[iontheball]

He might want to rethink that tactic when it comes to verbalizing thoughts that knock on the door of violating Constitutional rights.
____________________________________
The problem of mental instability and firearms is an extremely complex issue. For example, where do you stand on a wife beater husband and his guns? It’s just that I have seen, what I characterize, as a hyper reactive edginess by Trump supporters on a number of past issues. You can expect such immediate criticism from liberals, but, in my view, there are way too many “conservatives” standing ready to pile on Trump at the drop of a dime. He gets a non stop beating, day out and day in from all quarters. Then, we hear the President just had a two hour sit down last night for the second time with the NRA. At some point you have to develop a level of trust in the guy and not take everything he says extemporaneously as the law.

[bootless]

Thanks for your reply.

I’m not piling on him. I’m aware of the context, personalities, history, and surrounding events of this meeting, I also believe that I (and any other conservative) am justified in questioning and critiquing this tactic when the pull quote is blatantly anti-Constitutional.

Also, even if you support this (or any) POTUS who aligns with your principles, making this kind of comment more of an off-the-cuff thought spoken aloud... if there is no response to its lack of conformity to the Constitution, we can be sure that a potential tyrant-in-waiting will take notice of this silence.

Thanks.