I agree. Though I don’t have a problem with the way the author was using the statisics since he defined his parameter as “where the death toll went into the double digits” which means he is defining his parameter and being consistent with how he uses it.
That said, I wonder if other people (including the government) who analyze this type of thing have a fluid definition of the term “mass shooting” and sample the various levels until they find one that fits their agenda and use that one without defining it.
thanks. I agree about picking and choosing.
As hard as I tried, I couldn’t help feeling that muzzies killing is the point.
And it looked like he had a point searching for the data to make it.