Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/23/2018 12:08:23 PM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Elderberry
An equatorial launch complex offers the opportunity to decrease the amount of fuel the rockets need to reach geosynchronous orbits — often the preferred location for satellites — by as much as 20 percent or more, lowering the cost of each launch. Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Vector are interested in the cost savings Alcantara may offer to launch satellites.

That might be attractive to SpaceX, who currently has to trade off payload for the extra fuel required to soft land their boosters.

2 posted on 02/23/2018 12:17:09 PM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

Why not Ecuador? They get a head start on the ground level...........


3 posted on 02/23/2018 12:19:36 PM PST by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry
An equatorial launch complex offers the opportunity to decrease the amount of fuel the rockets need to reach geosynchronous orbits — often the preferred location for satellites — by as much as 20 percent or more, lowering the cost of each launch.

Seems this savings would be more than offset by the expense of getting all the equipment, personnel, material (and the fuel) down there.

I have to believe they've already applied all this to a spreadsheet and are satisfied it offers a savings... but I just don't see it.

4 posted on 02/23/2018 12:19:37 PM PST by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

An equatorial launch complex offers the opportunity to decrease the amount of fuel the rockets need to reach geosynchronous orbits — often the preferred location for satellites — by as much as 20 percent or more, lowering the cost of each launch. Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Vector are interested in the cost savings Alcantara may offer to launch satellites.

...

Rocket fuel is cheap compared to the cost of the rocket, much less than 20%. And then there is the cost and time to transport the rocket to Brazil.


11 posted on 02/23/2018 2:13:53 PM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry
Last time I ran the numbers, and I'd enjoy a correction, Equatorial angular momentum adds 300 meters per second from launch over KSC/CCAFB. One reason SpaceX might not have hustled for that extra push is their dependency on federal funding.

As I recall the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 holds host countries liable for its provisions, and the move to launch overseas does not remove FAA/US liabilities from domestic companies.

That treaty didn't become a public concern until the present century. It's worth a read.

"Peace in Space, Good Luck on Earth."

16 posted on 02/23/2018 4:18:34 PM PST by Prospero (Lex est rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson