This article advocates surrender. What matters is HOW you do the criticism — stick to the facts, make sure they are right, and avoid venting. It’s the latter that gets many conservatives in trouble.
Nope....this article is a "smart battle plan" when you are dealing with the slime pits of people like Pelosi, Obama, Clinton, Schumer, etc
If you are just a "Joe Schmoe", who doesn't pay much attention to the political games going on (and there are a lot more of them than you would think) when you attack the kids, they shut you out because you are "mean" and "heartless".
The SOBs want to "use children" for their propaganda? Fine, I'll shine a light on how they are "using children" and "harming them" without worrying about the damage they leave behind.
Starting sentence has been "I want to know who is behind abusing those traumatized children and why aren't their parents protecting them? Look at those poor babies....they are so traumatized, they are crying/shaking/shouting like they are about to break...... and the ghouls are throwing microphones in their faces and making them talk about it."
Works to start the conversation every time....
It also doesn't hurt to discuss the fact that the shooter seemed to have some type of "anger/rage" that led him to "break" and murder people.....and why would these kids parents/handlers want to fill these "victims" up with similar feelings instead of working with professionals to help them deal with their grief in a positive way? (But you have to be careful how you form this question so it doesn't sound like you are saying they will be our next shooters....just why is having that kind of rage a "good thing" for a child?)
BTW, it helps to understand that these ARE just kids. Doesn't matter if they have been indoctrinated or not. They are just IGNORANT kids who "trust" the adults around them...and have been brainwashed into thinking they are going to save the world. Shine light on the "handlers" and you can get even a "non political" Dem to start questioning what they are seeing.......