For a variety of reasons. Among them, I can’t see sending people back to a country they’ve never known, where they may not even speak the language, and are set up to fail once they get there, when they didn’t make the decision to break the law.
No citizenship. No voting. No criminality. And no being a public charge.
>
For a variety of reasons. Among them, I can’t see sending people back to a country they’ve never known, where they may not even speak the language,
>
And, that’s ‘OUR’ problem, how?? Actions have consequences, this is one (possible) to being an ILLEGAL *CRIMINAL* alien.
>
and are set up to fail once they get there, when they didn’t make the decision to break the law.
>
They decided to STAY, even after KNOWING they were in the country illegally. They made up their OWN mind to be, and remain, a law-breaker.
>
No citizenship. No voting. No criminality. And no being a public charge.
>
Hell, ‘no public charge’ used to the be THE baseline and govt cannot even do THAT right.
IMO, terminate the welfare state in any/all fashion. I suspect many ‘problems’ will self-correct.
“I can’t see sending people back to a country they’ve never known, where they may not even speak the language”
After 3 years of age, they knew the language of their country and still do.
If they need an orientation to their country, their parents - who broke the law here - can teach them when we deport them as a group.
Do you really think people raised by parents who do not speak English do not speak their parents language?