I want to see the results of gunpowder residue tests taken from ALL parts of his body. The skin and clothing residue tests should have been carefully labeled, isolated from each of the others, and protected from contamination. The “spread” on his body and clothes must have been very widespread if he did the tremendous amount of shooting.
In the linked article, the discussion of thorough rinsing of the body at autopsy worries me a bit. Did they even do widespread residue testing? The reason for this worry is that the absence of residue on certain parts of his body/clothing could be very telling. If residue is missing on his back, for example, he was likely “down” before the mass shooting.
” the discussion of thorough rinsing of the body at autopsy worries me a bit. “
Reminds me a bit of the “investigators” washing the flight 800 wreckage until it no longer tested positive for explosive residue.
Which was mentioned in an article at the time but explained away with a hand wave and a “those are false positives”.
Yes, how do we know Paddock was the shooter...