Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rashputin

“They were from the school of thought that figured they could make the Brand Name sufficient to carry whatever tired old product line they managed to get out the door.“

Personally, I like their tired old product line. Being a port-spider, all of my shotguns and most of my rifles are of the left handed version. The problem is appears to me, Remington strayed away from its core competency. Whenever a company does that they invariably have problems, loose customer base, sales, profits, etc. even go out of business.


10 posted on 02/13/2018 3:49:02 AM PST by snoringbear (,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: snoringbear

Mmmm... not so sure about that. The problem is that the market started moving away from *buying* their core competencies, so they bought in companies that were making what people wanted to buy. Where they screwed up was that they then ran them like another part of Remington, subject to the same crap that was ruining their main lines, and reduced this expertise they’d bought to some labels slapped on low quality weapons. They somehow managed to convert Bushmaster, which was a leading name in AR-15 pattern rifles at the time of purchase, into a laughingstock that nobody buys, to use one example.

They could have and should have left (again, to use the example) Bushmaster alone to continue in the marketplace. But they didn’t, they started micromanaging and needlessly consolidating their new purchase into what they already had.


17 posted on 02/13/2018 4:06:09 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson