Sounds like a personal problem. Even if he remarried, if the first marriage was a sham, why would we believe the second isn’t.
We need Vince from Sham-Wow to clean up this mess.
Anyhoo, not speaking from a point of the way I think things ought to be here, as I would have no-fault divorce without Cause not be illegal, but in a country where so many marriages end in divorce to judge the first to have been a sham because it ended is kinda shaky.
As I interpreted the story he had married one woman, divorced her, then married again and the first said the second was a sham marriage.
I did not think she was saying that her marriage, the first one to him, was the sham.
They are now saying the first said so under pressure, and she later recanted the charge but, silly thing that paperwork is, the charge remains in the system.
I don’t know if either were or are intended to be sham marriages, only that it appears until it’s clearly stated otherwise the current one has lasted for years, so it seems like it may not be a sham.
Editing problem: there is a “not” that should not be there.
I would that no-fault divorce was illegal.
Not “not illegal”.