Posted on 02/02/2018 6:47:43 AM PST by nbenyo
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows President Trump making substantial gains after Tuesday’s State of the Union speech, and achieving his highest voter approval since March 7, 2017.
Likely U.S. Voters are evenly split at 49% in their approval or disapproval of President Trump’s job performance.
The latest figures include 35% who Strongly Approve of the way Trump is performing and 38% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -3
(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...
Let’s see what happens to these polls after the memo and the counter-memo come out.
Fake News. Trump is at 59% at the very least.
These are the same pollsters that said Hilliary was a lock to win and Trump had no chance in hell of winning....................
FWIW, one of the questions I have to ask at the tax desk is if the client would like to check off on the presidential election fund (directing Congress to kick another $3 on the pile). When Øbama was pResident, the answer was almost always “hell no!” This year, I’m still getting a “no,” but it comes with a tone and body language that I’d have to characterize as heavy disdain if not disgust. And this is a fairly conservative county. I hate to say it, but there it is. It’s very disheartening, as it tells me the MSM is still having a big impact. This is totally anecdotal but it cannot be ignored.
Wrong. This pollster got the election right.
I am sure they worked quadruple-overtime to get the number down below 50%.
49% is amazing considering the non stop fake stories and negative press.
That’s not a poll, their poll was correct.
Here you go.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch_nov7
They had Clinton +2 which was dead on.
Yep, by 8:30 that night I knew it was over, the rest of the night was pure entertainment...............We watched PBS that night, and they called it for Trump I think before any of the majors did. Judy Woodruff looked like she was in shock..................
I’ve said no to that question ever since they put it on the form. I wouldn’t take it as a significant indicator one way or the other on the Prez. I think it is more about if the person wants another $ in government control of any type.
Could be that they just have come to distrust government as a whole and that is what you’re seeing.
That’s possible, and I agree to always answering “no.” Only the fringe candidates in it for the buffet take the funds. But it is the body language and the actual words spoken that have me concerned, not the “no.”
understood... and you’ve got a lot of history that you can validate against.. I’m just one point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.