Posted on 01/22/2018 3:59:44 PM PST by RoosterRedux
As was Qx. I didn’t want to pay attention to it. Finally decided to stand up and be counted at this critical point in history.
And I thought the log(pi) was bad!
People are lining up to tell me that Q hasn’t made any notable revelations or accurate predictions. I already knew that.
Thanks for the wise insightfulness. Congrats.
CA highway patrol? Pox told me above, I’ll look more, hope it is not for illegals!
I asked the same basic question on a different thread last night. I was given a list by Jocko of things that Q supposedly predicted, but when I started going through them meticulously, the first several were all bogus.
At that point Jocko admitted that they had never actually vetted any of the claims they had provided to me, as if that excused it. We had an amicable discussion, but it ended with me saying that the end result of the exercise was obviously further proof it's all a fraud.
A couple of ankle biters were chiming in that they believe Q no matter what. Who cares. If it's not legitimate, it needs to be questioned. If it can't stand up to questions, it needs to be discredited. And it has been, except to those that refuse to honestly analyze the information. And at this point they won't even debate anymore, because they're going to lose.
I can link that thread if needed, or you could just look at our histories. Thanks!
“Head-on, straight forward comms would mostly just trigger rebellion and resistance—NOT the desired goal.”
Then why is Trump’s straight forward approach proving so successful?
You have it spectacularly backwards.
There is a simple explanation for all this cryptic Q jibberish: it makes a few D&D types feel special to drop breadcrumbs and then pretend to be the only ones who can follow them.
I agree.
POTUS, his tweets etc. is a different context and different goals. No, I'm not going to explain that.
People are absolutely obfuscating when they rush to reply with personal insults. That is the defining mark of people defending a falsehood. People setting forth the truth don’t have to muck around in the gutter of ad hominem; they just put the facts out there and let them speak for themselves.
I’m worried this is about DPRK EMP Sats over us and having to take them down in the very near future.
Actually no, you didn't know. You may have had an intimation, as did most everyone on this site. That is why the notion of Q's “16 year plan” is all the more significant. IF proof can be provided, we are confronted with the moral imperative of what we are going to do about those involved, and the potentially larger question of dealing with known treasonous activity in the absence of legal justice.
Good analysis. I do a lot of my Q reading over on The_Donald. He absolutely has some true believers onboard there, but also some profoundly persuasive debunkers. So far the latter have made the stronger case.
This is all I ask. Make the case. Instead I get...insults.
Unpersuasive.
“No, I’m not going to explain that.”
Because you can’t
An alternate explanation is that they have grown weary of suffering far too many fools with far too much cheer.
They think his poll numbers are bad too because they listen to MSM. From what I can see, his enthusiastic voters are still MAGA with him, those who held their noses are starting to like him better but they don’t like his Tweets, a lot of Democrats are beginning to like them but don’t want to talk about it, and the far left hates him more than ever.
You should become “Z” and send out your own coded signals to your embeds....
You know what *you* know/knew. You can’t and don’t speak for me/what I know and when I knew it.
I don’t think the aware veteran red piller’s care that much if the stubbornly resistant to truth are persuaded any more. It’s not worth the grief and the bother to try and drag stubborn resistant folks kicking and screaming into awareness they are so fiercely resistant to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.