Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: impimp
No. Congress controls all spending for discretionary funds. The President can put together a budget, but Congress approves the spending. Some things are mandatory spending, like SS, Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps. Those are defined by laws other than appropriations bills.

The President can deem certain functions necessary for public safety and facility security, and the military still does its job, and these positions will all get paid when there is a new spending bill.

6 posted on 01/21/2018 7:15:10 PM PST by IYAS9YAS (There are two kinds of people: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IYAS9YAS

PRyno obviously lets EOs overrule his Budget Boffinism....

PRyno is a weak non-leader.


7 posted on 01/21/2018 7:24:32 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: IYAS9YAS

President Trump has all the financial power he needs for the war he is fighting from the 4 codes cited in the beginning of this

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

The Dems are concentrating on a distraction while he is playing a different game.


10 posted on 01/21/2018 7:51:30 PM PST by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: IYAS9YAS
Congress does indeed now spend the money it appropriates. However, that was not always the case. Up until 1974 the President could refuse to spend money that was appropriated.

Impoundment is an act by a President of the United States of not spending money that has been appropriated by the U.S. Congress. Thomas Jefferson was the first president to exercise the power of impoundment in 1801. The power was available to all presidents up to and including Richard Nixon, and was regarded as a power inherent to the office. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 was passed in response to perceived abuse of the power under President Nixon. Title X of the Act removed that power, and Train v. City of New York (whose facts predate the 1974 Act, but which was argued before the U.S. Supreme Court after its passage), closed potential loopholes in the 1974 Act. The president's ability to indefinitely reject congressionally approved spending was thus removed.

18 posted on 01/21/2018 9:24:13 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson